15-03-2016, 03:46 PM
Scott,
That was very funny. Thanks!
A modest suggestion: If I were you, I'd quit trying to find Warren Commission documents and FBI reports that might be of interest to Kennedy assassination researchers. There are a number of them out there who have been at this longer than either of us, probably longer than both of us combined, and all this stuff has been analyzed endlessly.
But you have something else that few, if any of us, has, and that is all those contacts with people in the Cuban immigrant community and those who came into contact with them. Many of those folks clearly trust you enough to allow themselves to be audio recorded, even videoed in some instances, doing interviews with you.
There are two enormous benefits to this. First, of course, it clearly establishes your bona fides as a serious researcher. You don't have to argue with anyone that you are doing legitimate research; the interviews speak for themselves.
Secondly, since the plotters of JFK's assassination clearly wanted to provoke an invasion of Cuba (quashed by LBJ via a total cover-up) your area of expertise is clearly front and center in this whole mess. Just like most other folks, the people your father knew--and the people you have spoken to--probably have only a limited knowledge of players and events surrounding JFK's murder, but these insights may nevertheless be invaluable in a few instances, and you may be the person best qualified in the world to find these nuggets and show them to the rest of us.
That was very funny. Thanks!
A modest suggestion: If I were you, I'd quit trying to find Warren Commission documents and FBI reports that might be of interest to Kennedy assassination researchers. There are a number of them out there who have been at this longer than either of us, probably longer than both of us combined, and all this stuff has been analyzed endlessly.
But you have something else that few, if any of us, has, and that is all those contacts with people in the Cuban immigrant community and those who came into contact with them. Many of those folks clearly trust you enough to allow themselves to be audio recorded, even videoed in some instances, doing interviews with you.
There are two enormous benefits to this. First, of course, it clearly establishes your bona fides as a serious researcher. You don't have to argue with anyone that you are doing legitimate research; the interviews speak for themselves.
Secondly, since the plotters of JFK's assassination clearly wanted to provoke an invasion of Cuba (quashed by LBJ via a total cover-up) your area of expertise is clearly front and center in this whole mess. Just like most other folks, the people your father knew--and the people you have spoken to--probably have only a limited knowledge of players and events surrounding JFK's murder, but these insights may nevertheless be invaluable in a few instances, and you may be the person best qualified in the world to find these nuggets and show them to the rest of us.
HarveyandLee.net
Chief Justice Earl Warren: "Full disclosure was not possible for reasons of national security." – 1964
CIA accountant James B. Wilcott: Oswald received "a full-time salary for agent work for doing CIA operational work." – 1978
HSCA counsel Robert Tanenbaum: “Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI.†– 1996
Chief Justice Earl Warren: "Full disclosure was not possible for reasons of national security." – 1964
CIA accountant James B. Wilcott: Oswald received "a full-time salary for agent work for doing CIA operational work." – 1978
HSCA counsel Robert Tanenbaum: “Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI.†– 1996