15-03-2016, 07:00 PM
Here's a rather interesting exchange with Buell Wesley Frazier during his House Select Committee on Assassinations in the late 1970's:
Moriarty: And that was after you had, uh-that you went to Irving.
Frazier: Hm-hmm
Moriarty: This is after- you knew at that time-you knew that Oswald was being.
Frazier: Framed
The above blurb was taken from page No. 8 of his full testimony given.
For those of you who may not already been familiar with his full exchange like me, though I suspect more than a few seasoned researchers already are, here, courtesy of the top-shelf research team down under, is a full transcript of Mr. Frazier's remarks ---Ã http://www.reopenkennedycase.net/richard...ction.html (Please scroll down to the 10th position)
Have to give credit where it's due because there are moments here when I believe Mr. Frazier is trying to reveal what's what, without revealing to parties yet unknown he is in fact doing so. Why is this man hedging his bets after all these years? Never too late to come clean, Mr. Frazier, dare you to.
Sidebar A: Mr. Doyle, should you venture in and the spirit moves you to post, by all means feel free to do so; however, out of respect for this Forum, and the sentiments expressed by Mr. DiEugenio in the now closed thread "Heads Up", and subsequently locked by Magda Hassan, let's try to refrain from straying off topic here, setting our focus more upon what Mr. Frazier shares than adding any conjecture, speculation, etc. to his remarks as it may or may not apply to Prayer Man. In fairness, I'll hold myself to the same standard.
Sidebar A1: Imagine that even someone as early as the night of the assassination knew the wrongfully accused was being framed.
Moriarty: And that was after you had, uh-that you went to Irving.
Frazier: Hm-hmm
Moriarty: This is after- you knew at that time-you knew that Oswald was being.
Frazier: Framed
The above blurb was taken from page No. 8 of his full testimony given.
For those of you who may not already been familiar with his full exchange like me, though I suspect more than a few seasoned researchers already are, here, courtesy of the top-shelf research team down under, is a full transcript of Mr. Frazier's remarks ---Ã http://www.reopenkennedycase.net/richard...ction.html (Please scroll down to the 10th position)
Have to give credit where it's due because there are moments here when I believe Mr. Frazier is trying to reveal what's what, without revealing to parties yet unknown he is in fact doing so. Why is this man hedging his bets after all these years? Never too late to come clean, Mr. Frazier, dare you to.
Sidebar A: Mr. Doyle, should you venture in and the spirit moves you to post, by all means feel free to do so; however, out of respect for this Forum, and the sentiments expressed by Mr. DiEugenio in the now closed thread "Heads Up", and subsequently locked by Magda Hassan, let's try to refrain from straying off topic here, setting our focus more upon what Mr. Frazier shares than adding any conjecture, speculation, etc. to his remarks as it may or may not apply to Prayer Man. In fairness, I'll hold myself to the same standard.
Sidebar A1: Imagine that even someone as early as the night of the assassination knew the wrongfully accused was being framed.