15-03-2016, 09:40 PM
An excellent point @Mr. Riddle, certainly a curious dynamic exhibited by the HSCA.
@Mr. DiEugenio Appreciate the specific origins of this wealth of information.
You've managed to do it once again, Mr. Josephs, shedding a much broader light upon the intricate details, reaching far into the darkness surrounding the rock and hard spot an impressionable young teen found himself in on one of the darkest days in history.
The more I read along through the entirety of the full transcript, the more obvious it becomes Mr. Frazier was forced to sell his soul to the devil. Talk about an either/or proposition.
In a legal since, If Mr. Frazier affixed his signature to any "official" government documents circa 1963/64, essentially saying he wouldn't ever fully divulge the private, sensitive information he really knows, Would there be a stiff penalty awaiting him?
Stiff as in "swimming w/the fishes"? Stiff.
As it is Mr. Shields' HSCA on the same link in post 1 is tearing holes into Mr. Frazier's fairytale about watching the wrongfully accuse walk 100-150yards ahead of him carrying a package (right!). Mr. Shields contends that the wrongfully accused was noticeably absent when Mr. Frazier parked his car that morning, so much so that he remembers someone shouting out to Mr. Frazier, inquiring about the whereabouts of his rider.
Of course, within his own HSCA testimony, Mr. Frazier accredits much of "his" testimony by pointing all five fingers at the menacing round of intimidation tactics he endured by an intense round of multiple teams interrogating him for hours on end.
@Mr. DiEugenio Appreciate the specific origins of this wealth of information.
You've managed to do it once again, Mr. Josephs, shedding a much broader light upon the intricate details, reaching far into the darkness surrounding the rock and hard spot an impressionable young teen found himself in on one of the darkest days in history.
The more I read along through the entirety of the full transcript, the more obvious it becomes Mr. Frazier was forced to sell his soul to the devil. Talk about an either/or proposition.
In a legal since, If Mr. Frazier affixed his signature to any "official" government documents circa 1963/64, essentially saying he wouldn't ever fully divulge the private, sensitive information he really knows, Would there be a stiff penalty awaiting him?
Stiff as in "swimming w/the fishes"? Stiff.
As it is Mr. Shields' HSCA on the same link in post 1 is tearing holes into Mr. Frazier's fairytale about watching the wrongfully accuse walk 100-150yards ahead of him carrying a package (right!). Mr. Shields contends that the wrongfully accused was noticeably absent when Mr. Frazier parked his car that morning, so much so that he remembers someone shouting out to Mr. Frazier, inquiring about the whereabouts of his rider.
Of course, within his own HSCA testimony, Mr. Frazier accredits much of "his" testimony by pointing all five fingers at the menacing round of intimidation tactics he endured by an intense round of multiple teams interrogating him for hours on end.