29-03-2016, 08:04 PM
Alan Ford Wrote:Tracy Riddle Wrote:Alan, with most of the TSBD employees (especially the women), we have no contemporary photographs or physical descriptions of them. Quite a few gave only very general statements about where they were standing, not specific enough to be sure if they might be prayer man/woman.
A good point, Mr. Riddle, however sir, Would it be fair to say those women weren't laborers but general office workers? How many employers do you know in a professional setting like a publisher's office would allow their employees to dress akin to Prayer Man? I get the impression a professional setting like that requires much higher standards.
That said, other than that one specific name already attributed to Prayer Man, it seems anything and everything else offered to date has to deal in generics rather than specifics. There is a reason for that. Why is everything and anything else void of specifics?
Specific Count Total:
Prayer Man (1) with ample evidence to back up his claim, offering more than a few specifics.
prayer woman (0) no specific name, let alone any specific details
prayer person (0) no specific name, let alone any specific details
Again, there is a reason for that.
Mr Ford, as I posted on another thread, I have not seen "ample evidence" that indicates PrayerPerson is a male, and without that indication I cannot believe that the image represents Lee Harvey Oswald. I did express an opinion that the PrayerPerson image may represent Ms Sarah Stanton, and the reason for that opinion as to identity, is because there is ample testimony that Ms Sarah Stanton is among the occupants of the TSBD doorway entrance area at the time of the JFK assassination. As I have stated, I have not seen any satisfactory indication of any image that represents Ms Sarah Stanton being elsewhere at the time of the picture. So, I have not been able to remove her name as being the person represented in the image known to me as PrayerPerson. Although some may refer to the image as PrayerMan, or PrayerWoman, since that is their belief, I remain open minded and await ample evidence either way. I do believe, what may be thought of as ample evidence is actually only ample opinion. And, I again affirm that to my knowledge, my opinion is not mine alone, nor do I claim to be the first to offer said opinion. In any event, I do not believe the person represented in the PrayerPerson image is guilty of any wrongdoing in the murder of our elected president on 11/22/'63. But, this statement is about as specific I can reasonably be at this time.
Larry
StudentofAssassinationResearch