30-03-2016, 02:52 PM
Given the specific photo you shared, Mr. Phipps, and the element of time and space, I can only tell you at this point it isn't Prayer Man.
However, perhaps if the authorities had given Mr. Rowland's (Arnold) observations the time of day, instead if ignoring his sighting of at least two figures, their identification would be more apparent. But like so much in this case, anything contrary to the scripted fairytale is avoided like a plague. Why?
There's a reason for that.
Now, entering Day Two (2), the specifics scorecard still reads the same ---->
The wrongfully accused (3) (where were you? "out front"; with who? "Billy Shelley"; and, no one else places their position in his specific location)
prayer woman (0), no specific name, let alone any specific details, which given most women's propensity to talk, no offense to Em or any other women, we should have at least something however remote to go on. Fails the "any strangers" litmus test.
prayer person (0) no specific name, let alone any specific details. Also fails the "any strangers" litmus test.
However, perhaps if the authorities had given Mr. Rowland's (Arnold) observations the time of day, instead if ignoring his sighting of at least two figures, their identification would be more apparent. But like so much in this case, anything contrary to the scripted fairytale is avoided like a plague. Why?
There's a reason for that.
Now, entering Day Two (2), the specifics scorecard still reads the same ---->
The wrongfully accused (3) (where were you? "out front"; with who? "Billy Shelley"; and, no one else places their position in his specific location)
prayer woman (0), no specific name, let alone any specific details, which given most women's propensity to talk, no offense to Em or any other women, we should have at least something however remote to go on. Fails the "any strangers" litmus test.
prayer person (0) no specific name, let alone any specific details. Also fails the "any strangers" litmus test.