Challenge

[Alan Ford]

I assume that the "wrongfully accused" mentioned is a reference to Lee Harvey Oswald. If so, can a link to a video and/or audio recording of him making an "out front with Bill Shelley" statement? I have yet to see and/or hear that statement by LHO. I did hear him say, on video w/audio, paraphrasing, that he was in the TSBD building at the time because he worked there. There is ample testimony indicating LHO was not among the TSBD doorway area occupants at the time of the JFK assassination, and the notepad scribbling I have seen is quite ambiguous.

There's a reason those in the know made a decision to avoid allowing any audio, and/or video coverage of the wrongfully accused's series of interrogations over his three days in custody.

Is it much easier to frame someone with trumped up hearsay "evidence" than allowing them a fair opportunity to have access to a recorded audio and video hearing, where the general public could hear him calmly share an airtight alibi, which would then lead to an open public outcry of follow the evidence, not the script. Better to shoot him before heading down that slippery-slope eh...

The dynamics in this case are textbook for how not to handle an open and fair inquiry.

Now, this Challenge is producing everything and anything but any specifics about prayer woman or prayer person. There is a reason for that.

Let's take a look at the Challenge Board:

Still standing at only one entity offering any specifics, Prayer Man. Thus the tally reads...

The wrongfully accused (5) (where were you? "out front"; with who? "Bill Shelley"; and, no one else places their position in his specific location)

prayer woman (0), no specific name, let alone any specific details, which given most women's propensity to talk, no offense to Em or any other women, we should have at least something however remote to go on. Fails the "any strangers" litmus test.

prayer person (0) no specific name, let alone any specific details. Also fails the "any strangers" litmus test.

"They saw no one there" (There's a reason for that).