Challenge

[Alan Ford]

Nice post, Alan.

Don't expect any specific details from Conehead.

What a delightful surprise! Look whose back! Hey, Jerry, one cold Guinness please, and bring this distinguished gentleman whatever he wants. Good to see you, Mr. Mitcham. Enjoy your day sir. Cheers!

Thank you for your welcome, Alan. I might take you up on that offer, if we ever meet.

You're certainly welcome, Mr. Mitcham

It's individuals like yourself that prompts me to genuinely consider putting some travel expenses aside to actually attend an event someday. November is still yonder there on the horizon, so hopefully a major event is in the works/planning stages, where researchers may convene for a few days. Learn, fellowship, relax and unwind, etc. Securing a panel of speakers, securing comfortable accommodations, etc. must be a logistic challenge I'm sure, but what a wonderful lifetime experience to fellowship with some of the best and finest in one setting. I won't hold you to it but you strike me as an ideal Master of Ceremonies, engaging yet wise in a time management sense as well, moving the proceedings along smoothly at an adept pace, while making the audience and panel alike feel comfortable.

Moving along now to the seventh day of this Challenge, here's yet another instance bolstering the wrongfully accused being none other than Prayer Man:

(A) in their initial same day notes, Inspector Thomas Kelly and FBI agent James Bookout place Mr. Oswald downstairs on the first floor eating his lunch in the domino room, with one saying the wrongfully accused ate alone, while Mr. Kelly said the wrongfully accused claimed to eat with a couple of his fellow employees, notably James "Junior" Jarman; however, after the wrongfully accused's death, Mr. Bookout suddenly alters his initial same day notes to infer (unlike his earliest FBI report bearing no mention of the wrongfully accused being stopped by a police officer) that Oswald encounters a policeman in the 2nd floor lunchroom. (Much easier to create "evidence" after someone is dead).There's a reason for that.

(B) Now, getting back to Inspector Kelly's notes where he claimed the now deceased wrongfully accused said he ate lunch with Mr. Jarman, nothing could be further from the truth. All the wrongfully accused said was he saw Mr. Jarman and another "short Negro" whose name he didn't know. The truth here is that as late as 12:25PM as Mr. Jarman and his short friend made their way around to the back of the building to head up to their final destination to view the parade up on the 5th floor, the wrongfuly accused saw them, nothing more, nothing less; however, because the fix was in they tainted this encounter with a self-serving lie: suggesting that the wrongfully accused claimed he had lunch with these men. Why did the encounter on the first floor have to be watered down to discredit the wrongfully accused? Because if he lied about having lunch with Mr. Jarman, he must be lying about everything else.

Curiously enough, Warren Commission counselor Ball in his exchange with Mr. Jarman made sure for the record to ask him if ate his lunch with the wrongfully accused. Without batting an eye surely Mr. Jarman's response would be "no", because, after all that is the truth. Oh, how clever to paint the wrongfully accused as a sneaky liar though. However, on a good note, both Mr. Jarman and his shorter friend, within their respective Warren Commission testimonies do place the wrongfully accused down on the first floor as late as 12:25. That presents a real problem for the fairytale script of his guilt. If these gentlemen place the wrongfully accuse downstairs as late as 12;25, then it begs the question, Who are the two individuals Mr. Rowland (Arnold) sees handling guns in the windows above at 12:15PM?

As the excitement outside ramped up, its not frivolous to believe the wrongfully accused simply left the domino room sometime between 12:26-12:30 and stepped outside on the entrance stairs to view the parade. Given the position he takes up, and the movement of Mr. Lovelady's head as depicted in film to acknowledge a sudden movement/presence, he simply had no choice but to take that position given the crowded steps. Hold on a sec have to open a jar of salsa for Em more to follow...

Over this seven day Challenge, specific evidence, from officialdom and his coworkers alike, has been shared daily bolstering the chances that Prayer Man is the wrongfully accused. To date, we have yet to hear any specifics at all related to prayer woman, prayer person, prayer thing, prayer it, prayer ghost, prayer ______, etc. There is a reason for that. None of those entities have specific names, nor a credible explanation to explain away the "any strangers" litmus test. Essentially, they have nothing (0).



*Credit Ace Card Researcher Mr. Murphy (Sean)



[FONT=&amp]
[/FONT]