Challenge

[Alan Ford]

Alan's clearly in contempt.

That which you are beneath?

When you have 2 different sources corroborating a 5 foot 5 or 6 height that is usually good in court and obviates the need for any spurious identity diversions.

Let us see your sun plane calculations, Buttons.

Sainthood awaits you, Mr. Mitcham

Have to wonder if evidence based specifics matter in court?

Yet to date we have nary a single specific from those not yet ready to concede the obvious. They have nothing (0). Plenty of buttons, phantom handbags, etc., but nary a single evidence based specific. There's a reason for that.

Only one entity has provided any specifics to date within this Challenge, Prayer Man. There's a reason for that.

He has a specific name. He told anyone willing to listen where He specifically was, and who He specifically was with. He was encountered at the front door entrance, a specific location. Moreover, no one has ever lay claim to being in His specific position in the historical record. There's a reason for that.

Enjoy your day, Mr. Mitcham, wish you didn't have to explain that the Sun rises and sets everyday regardless of who may think otherwise.

Latest tally on the eve of Day Nine (9) of this Challenge: prayer woman, prayer person, prayer thing, prayer it, prayer ghost, prayer pick a spawn, etc. (0) specifics. They have nothing (0). There is a reason for that.

Bless you my son! ::

Don't forget the long hair and the purse to go with the imaginary buttons.

If the idiot, Doyle, had any specific details, he would produce them but it is all in his mind.

He talks about "sun plane" but can't say what it means and show his calculations. Shows his level of intelligence.

As Walter Mondale used to say "Where's the beef?' Buttons?

Appreciate the blessings, Mr. Mitcham, we all can benefit from timely blessings amid this journey we call life. May you & yours be showered with more than a few of your own Sir.

It's not easy to talk in specifics, so some people are left with little choice but to speak language void of it. There is a reason for that.

Politicians have mastered this trait, often "answering" a specific question with another question. There's a reason for that.

This simple Challenge within this thread is merely asking anyone who would rather avoid the obvious to produce a specific name for whatever masquerading Prayer Man wannabe they choose. Then offer a credible explanation to explain away why their specific named (prayer woman, prayer thing, prayer it, prayer ghost, etc. isn't a stranger). To date, no one has been able to do that. There's a reason for that.

IF Prayer Man isn't the obvious, then this Challenge serves to invite anyone to simply enlighten the research community with evidence based specifics to the contrary. No maybe, seems, appears, etc...

The wrongfully accused has offered more than a few specifics of His own to substantiate his claim to Prayer Man's existence. He even tells us precisely where He was, with a specific location, citing outside, precisely where Prayer Man appears in the photographic record; and, specifically shares who He was with, producing a specific name. Why so many specifics with the wrongfully accused, yet (0) for anyone or anything else to date. There's a reason for that.

Q & A relative to Prayer Man is just a click away -----> http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq