08-06-2016, 09:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-06-2016, 09:58 PM by Albert Doyle.)
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:I have no idea what Doyle hopes to accomplish by calling me a lone nut advocate. That is simply looney.
You're putting words in my mouth that I didn't say Jim. I clearly said that the best discussion of the evidence inevitably leads to a point where denial of real assassination events conflicts with the stated purpose of this site and has to be reckoned with. That is clearly NOT calling you a Lone Nutter which I definitely did not do. What I did say is that argument of wrongful information whose content and tenor misleads the public on the truth of assassination matters is the equal of the same violation that Lone Nutters commit and is restricted by this site by rule. You know, it's sort of what you do, criticizing people for getting stuff wrong. Only this time I feel you are wrong and you are violating your own standards. That was clear from what I wrote. It is unfair to suggest otherwise.
I feel that you are ignoring Leary's documented and real investigation of Mary Meyers' death by means of faulty logic. It makes sense that Leary would not get emotional on his roof or engage in an investigation in New York for a person he never met. Just the opposite, this reaction bespeaks the relationship Janney claims. Second, you overtly suggested the recently-discovered letter was a fake. The provenance suggests it isn't. Again, no need for any unpleasantness, but I feel this deserves an answer since you have taken a position that is not correct.
We've already covered the fact that if you look for flaws in Janney you will find them, however in my opinion that doesn't answer or compensate for the things I pointed-out. Do you understand, Jim, that Janney could have chased bad sources on a good theory and that it is the responsibility of good researchers to sift the credible information from the whole? This is the "little bit pregnant" rule I have pointed-out many times before. What you are doing is like saying a huge mound of manure that contains a million dollars in gold flakes strewn through it should be thrown out because it is a big smelly pile of ****. The good researcher goes for the gold no matter what it is contained in.
.