24-07-2016, 03:09 PM
Drew Phipps Wrote:What truly baffles me about this situation is that it has received almost 0 airplay in the US media, especially in light of the political contest where the Republicans have a lot to gain by criticizing the incumbent's policies. A US airbase under siege? With nuclear weapons? By a purported ally in NATO? Where the purported ally alleges US involvement in a coup attempt? Nothing to see here, folks...
I have to say it doesn't really baffle me. I can't remember the last time the western media was wholly honest and independently reported the news. The US & British media is at the present just an extension of neocon interests. It's why I barely use the mainstream media to gather information, but use other truly independent journalistic sources instead. It's a terribly sad state of affairs.
Meanwhile my experience is that the silence you speak of strongly suggests that the US not only knew about the coup but green-lighted it via a nod and a wink. That sort of silence is not that unusual - either in the US or here in the UK. I've come across it a number of times.
As Pepe Escobar says in the just published article below, nothing happens in that part of the world that the US doesn't know about. By keeping silent they showed their hand anyway. Erdogan, who for me is a dangerous egocentric maniac, won't easily forgive or forget that.
I would also note here a recent news story quoting the Turkish defence minister who offered Incirlik Air Base for use by the Russians to jointly fight ISIS in Syria. The defence minister later retracted the story saying it had been a misunderstanding. My guess, however, is that it was used to send a veiled message to the US and NATO that it's days were numbered and to further highlight the strategic shift of Turkey towards Russia and away from the US and NATO -- something that Washington has been having kittens about.
I now wonder how long it will be before either the US & NATO pull out of Turkey (they surely won't want to leave their nuclear weapons there now, anyway) or are thrown out by Erdogan?
We are living in very interesting times and potentially very, very dangerous times. We have reached the time when it is the twilight of the empire, which is decaying around us and shows all the signs of dissolution. The question for me is whether it will let nature take its course or go out in a massive dogmatic Gottadamerung?
Quote:PEPE ESCOBAR | 23.07.2016 | OPINION[URL="http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/07/23/sultan-emergency-swing.html"]Source
The Sultan of (Emergency) Swing
Amidst an astonishing, relentless, wide-ranging purge that shows no signs of abating, with 60,000 and counting civil servants, academics, judges, prosecutors, policemen, soldiers jailed, fired, suspended or stripped of professional accreditation, it's relatively established by now the Turkish government was very much informed a military coup was imminent on July 15. The information may have come from Russian intelligence, although neither Moscow nor Ankara will reveal any details. So, once and for all, this was no false flag.A top, secular Middle Eastern intel analyst with an Istanbul front seat view to the coup clarified the internal political context even before the widely expected proclamation of a state of emergency (if France can do it, why not Turkey?):«They knew five to six hours beforehand that a coup was in the works and let it go ahead, knowing, as they must have, that it would fail… This affair has propelled Erdogan to semi-divine status among his supporters. The way is clear for him to get what he wants, which will be a powerful presidency and removal of the secularism principle in the constitution. This would set the stage for the introduction of aspects of Sharia law. He tried this in the early years of the AKP government with the introduction of Zina, a strictly Islamic provision, which would have criminalized adultery and could have opened the door to the criminalization of other islamically illicit sexual relations as Zina is about this in general and not just adultery. But when the EU objected he backed off».The intel source adds, «in the weeks leading up to this Erdogan had been unusually subdued. In this same period the Prime Minister had been replaced and the new one had announced a complete foreign policy reversal, including repairing relations with Syria. Did Erdogan reach the conclusion himself that the Syria policy was unsustainable, or was it forced upon him by the party elders, against the background of the tremendous damage it has done to the country in various ways, let along to Syria? If it was pushed on him, then the failed coup gives him the opportunity to reassert his authority over the top echelon of the AKP. Certainly this came at a most convenient time».Turkish historian Cam Erimtan adds to the context, explaining how «at the beginning of next month, the High Military Council of Turkey (or YAŞ, in acronymized Turkish) is set to convene and it is expected that a large number of officers will be made redundant then. The Turkish state is set to engage in a cleansing exercise, removing any and all opponents of the AKP-led government. This coup-that-was-no-coup then provides ample ammunition for a thorough culling of the ranks… even as the President has been pointing the finger across the Atlantic at the shadowy figure of Fethullah Gülen and his supposed terror organization FETÖ (Fettullahçı Terör Örgütü, or Fethullahist Terror Organization), insinuating that the coup plotters are part and parcel of this shadowy, clearly elusive, and possibly even non-existent, organization».The end result won't be pretty; «Erdoğan is now also being referred to as Turkey's Commander-in-Chief, which would indicate, among other things, that he regards the attempted coup as a personal attack on his figure. Whatever the coup plotters' motives might have been, the end result of their actions will be an even more wholehearted and enthusiastic acceptance of Erdoğan's policy of Sunnification and possibly a rather swift dismantling of the nation state that is Turkey, to be replaced by an «Anatolian federation of Muslim ethnicities», possibly linked to a revived caliphate, as well as a possible return of Sharia to Turkey».It's as if Erdogan has been blessed with a reverse Godfather effect. In Coppola's masterpiece, Michael Corleone famously says, «Just when you think you're out, they pull you back in». In Godfather Erdogan's case, just when he thought he was hopelessly entrapped, «God» as he admitted pulled him out. Talk about a Sultan of Swing.The Lions against the FalconsAs Erdogan solidifies his internal iron grip, a formerly iron clad connection NATO/Turkey slowly dissolves into thin air. It's as if the fate of Incirlik air base was hangin' literally by a few, selected radar threads.There's extreme suspicion across the spectrum in Turkey that the Pentagon knew what the «rebels» were up to. It's a fact that not a pin drops in Incirlik without the Americans knowing it. AKP members stress the use of NATO's communication network to coordinate the putschists and thus escape Turkish intel. At a minimum, the putschists may have believed NATO would have their backs. No «NATO ally» deigned itself to warn Erdogan about the coup.Then there's the saga of the refueling tanker for the «rebel» F-16s. The tankers in Incirlik are all the same model KC-135R Stratotanker for Americans and Turks alike. They work side by side and are all under the same command; the 10th Main Tanker Base, led by Gen. Bekir Ercan Van, who was duly arrested this past Sunday as seven judges also confiscated all the control tower communications. Not by accident Gen. Bekir Ercan Van happened to be very close to Pentagon head Ash Carter.What happened in Turkish airspace after Erdogan's Gulfstream IV left the Mediterranean coast and landed in Istanbul's Ataturk airport has been largely mapped but there are still some crucial gaps in the narrative open to speculation. As Erdogan has been tight-lipped in all his interviews, one is left with a Mission Impossible-style scenario featuring «rebel» F-16s «Lion One» and «Lion Two» on a «special mission» with their transponder off; their face off with loyalist «Falcon One» and «Falcon Two»; one of the «Lions» piloted by the none other than the man who shot down the Russian Su-24 last November; the by now famous tanker that took off from Incirlik to refuel the «rebels»; and three extra pairs of F-16s that took off from Dalaman, Erzurum and Balikesir to intercept the «rebels», including the pair that protected Erdogan's Gulfsteam (which was using callsign THY 8456 to disguise it as a Turkish Airlines flight).But who was behind it all?
Erdogan on a mission from GodNotorious Saudi whistleblower «Mujtahid» caused a sensation as he revealed that the UAE not only «played a role» in the coup but also kept the House of Saud in the loop. As if this was not damning enough, the self-deposed emir of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad al-Thani, very close to Erdogan, has alleged that the US and another Western nation (France is a strong possibility) had staged the whole thing, with Saudi Arabian involvement. Ankara, predictably, denied all of it.Iran, on the other hand, clearly saw the long game and was a staunch supporter of Erdogan from the start. And once again no one will talk about it, of course, but Russian intel was very much aware of all these moves something added credence by President Putin's prompt phone call to Erdogan post-coup. Once again, the basic facts; every intel operative in Southwest Asia knows that without a Pentagon green light, Turkish military factions would have had an extremely hard, if not impossible, time to organize a coup. Moreover, during that fateful night, until it was clear the coup was a failure, the plotters from Washington to Brussels were not exactly being described as «evil».A top American intel source, which does not subscribe to the usual Beltway consensus, is adamant that, «the Turkish military would not have moved without the green light from Washington. The same thing was planned for Saudi Arabia in April 2014, but was blocked at the highest levels in Washington by a friend of Saudi Arabia».The source, thinking outside the box, subscribes to what should be regarded as the key, current working hypothesis; the coup took place, or was fast-forwarded, essentially «because of Erdogan's sudden rapprochement with Russia». Turks across the spectrum would add fuel to the fire, insisting that more than likely the Istanbul airport bombing was an Operation Gladio. Rumor mills from East to West are already advancing that Erdogan should leave NATO sooner or later and join the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO).As much as Erdogan is an absolutely unreliable player and a loose geopolitical cannon, an invitation from Moscow-Beijing in a not too distant future may be forthcoming. Putin and Erdogan will have an absolutely crucial meeting in early August. Erdogan has been on the phone with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani. What he said did send shivers throughout NATO's spine: «Today, we are determined more than ever before to contribute to the solution of regional problems hand in hand with Iran and Russia and in cooperation with them».So once again, the defining early 21st century choice is in play; NATO against Eurasia integration, with Turkey's Sultan of Swing aptly swinging right in the middle. «God» certainly toyed with the tantalizing scenario when he spoke to Erdogan on Face Time.
[/URL]
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14