22-09-2009, 01:10 PM
Ed,
Your stance regarding the Edmonds affair reflects keen instincts and both the ability and the willingness to learn from history.
If indeed Ms. Edmonds is a mole (QJ/LINGUIST?) implanted deep within our extended community, then the operation supporting this penetration (Cunning Linguist?) has been handled masterfully.
To be clear: I am not suggesting that such is the case. Rather, I am commending you for maintaining a cool head and a deep political perspective.
Then again ... All of us in the Junior G-Man program must understand that the most difficult challenge before us is to differentiate between aurum and iron sulfide.
Currently I'm reserving judgment on Ms. Edmonds. But I am leaning -- noticeably -- in one direction.
Charlie
Your stance regarding the Edmonds affair reflects keen instincts and both the ability and the willingness to learn from history.
If indeed Ms. Edmonds is a mole (QJ/LINGUIST?) implanted deep within our extended community, then the operation supporting this penetration (Cunning Linguist?) has been handled masterfully.
To be clear: I am not suggesting that such is the case. Rather, I am commending you for maintaining a cool head and a deep political perspective.
Then again ... All of us in the Junior G-Man program must understand that the most difficult challenge before us is to differentiate between aurum and iron sulfide.
Currently I'm reserving judgment on Ms. Edmonds. But I am leaning -- noticeably -- in one direction.
Charlie