From fake 2000 electoral rolls to fake 9/11 victims

[Charles Drago]

Charles...I am not so sure that the claim is so outlandish.

I first smelled a turd when the Feds established a huge 911 Victims
Fund, up to a MILLION DOLLARS for primary relatives (wife, children)
with the PROVISO THAT THEY WOULD ANSWER NO QUESTIONS REGARDING
THEIR RELATIVES. My nostrils rebelled right then at the smell of this.
The few* who turned down the bribe were roundly persecuted.

I checked the website making the claims, and there is considerable
evidence that passenger names and some ground names were
computer generated, using a common simulation program, which
can reverse engineer the names. It is worth taking seriously enough
to pursue.

The fact that BURTON scoffed at it makes me think it has some validity.

Jack

*such as Ellen Mariani

Jack,

Two of my concerns with raising the falsified deaths claim at this time are that A) doing so violates my Prime Directive for investigating deep political crimes: establish the "how" of the crime -- in this case, the manners in which the buildings were brought down or damaged and U.S. national airspace security breached -- beyond all reasonable doubt and to broad public acceptance BEFORE moving on to the "who" and "why" investigations, and B) in its current raw state it gives cover to the cover-up artists by presenting as an easy strawman candidate.

All of us -- including you and your noble comrades in the first or second generations of JFK researchers -- must learn from our personal and collective errors. Among the skill sets we have to master are those of the propagandist.

God knows they're used against us with devastating effect.

So ... Do I think that the issue is deserving of deeper investigation?

Yes.

But let's keep our heads -- and our own counsel.

Charlie