25-10-2016, 03:25 PM
Thomas Neal Wrote:Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Your previous statements regarding the "missing cloth" at the site of the "lead smear" *appear* to indicate that you believe this was caused by a projectile. If so, then the FBI Lab test is irrelevant unless you can point out a *different* site with some type of blood/lead/something where the sample was removed.Thomas Neal Wrote:Hello Bob,Do you believe the missing cloth from the outer layer of the tie is where the FBI sample was removed, or a nick from a projectile?Aside from the above "missing cloth" and the scissor cut near the knot, are you aware of any other tie damage on either the front or the back?I'm more interested in the FBI's description of what we perceive to be a bloodstain as a "lead smear". Did they have any tests for metal traces to back this claim up?
I have some additional stuff that I could post, but if you believe that "missing cloth" was removed by a projectile, then it would be a waste of my time to post it.
Tom
What I believe is irrelevant to the truth. If it can be proven the nick in the tie was the result of a sample being removed by the FBI or the result of a projectile grazing the tie, we will just have to live with that truth, one way or the other.
As I said, if you have information about the blood stain being a lead smear, I would be very interested in it.
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964