20-11-2016, 04:04 PM
David Guyatt Wrote:Cliff Varnell Wrote:Anthony Thorne Wrote:Emphasis on 'maybe' helped, asserted with fuck all evidence, and yet another bit of propaganda from The Guardian, who have had it in for Assange for years now. The Guardian is simply trolling these days.
From the recent Wikileaks Q&A, re the comment from the political analyst -
https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/5...ur_editor/
Quote:He is just a political pundit, akin to the likes of Bill O'Reilly, and was just repeating speculative claims.
They hung Clinton for such.
Shoe's on the other foot now.
Popcorn?
You really do take the biscuit with this. How can you possibly liken Assange to Clinton? In-fucking-credible, maladroit, contemptuous tosh.
But then you still buy that London Bridge story about Putin leaking the DNC email to Wikileaks, even though everyone and their dog now knows it was a Podesta/Clinton scam to hoodwink unwitting voters.
Never let it be said that you are not hidebound in your thinking, Cliff....
But, I suppose, if the cap fits, then at least you wear the "unwitting" hat proudly. A small triumph for you in an otherwise storm of naive cobblers you litter across this folder.
.
I likened the casting of accusations -- Clinton and Assange both stand accused, do they not? -- to point out how easy it is to make them.
Now the accusations are going the other way.
How am I wrong?
It's easy to insult people David -- making an actual argument is something else.