The deposit slip that was never stamped by the bank

[Tom Scully]

With all due respect, Jim, the more time and effort I put into doing my own research in reaction to your numerous presentations, the more I understand what you do not know and do not care to know. I've become convinced you have no idea what the specific FRB processing/clearing was for the yellow-tinted, tabulation card, aka the money order in the amount of $21.45. I have established the fact that the money order form sold at Dallas until close of business on 4 January, 1963, was processed by FRB and that processing included an FRB processing center operator manually reading the amount displayed on each blue-tinted money order and manually key punching holes into the money order card that denoted the amount the operator had manually read. So that is actual documentation of the FRB marking the blue-tinted money order tabulator card during processing, but the money order in the amount of $21.45 was on a yellow tinted tabulator card with holes corresponding to the face amount already key punched in as it was created by the new Friden money order machine. No documentation as to how the accepting bank or the FRB processing actually did or did not mark the new yellow tinted, post January 4, 1963 money orders sold at the Dallas P.O. has actually been presented by you, or by John.

http://www.google.com/patents/US2785800
.......
..After payment at banks or post offices the postal money order cards are then cleared and processed at the Federal Reserve Bank by the present machine. A group of cashed money order cards is placed in the hopper or magazine of the present machine and upon depression of the motor release bar to cycle the machine each is automatically fed to a viewing station. During this time the District Number designation or hole which Was prepunched in the postal money order card is sensed and stored up by relays until such time that it is read out to control the predetermined extent of rotation of a sorting drum to select a pocket determined by the Federal Reserve District number designation.
With the card in the viewing station the amount written on the card is read by the operator and set up under control of the ten-key keyboard mechanism of the basic machine. For the first card fed from the magazine a depression of the motor release bar causes a single cycle of the operation of the machine and the rotation of the sorting drum at the termination of the cycle, but thereafter a depression of the motor release bar following the ten-key keyboard operation causes the machine to take two cycles, and the position of the drum is not changed until after the second cycle. During the first of the two cycles the card which was at the viewing station is fed to the punching station where it is stopped.
After the card punching has been completed the card stop located in the card punching mechanism is released and the card then advances to the check receiving chute of the basic machine.....

But, we are discussing a money order with a March, 1963 date on it, and the only thing I know for sure is that you have no evidence related to the process marking of this yellow-tint, 1963 money order that required no FRB key punching. Remember the guy you told me was admitted into the NYC radio station to meet with the talk show host? This is a similar scenario in that, just as in that example, I supported all that I claimed with documentation both John and you had never seen before. You asked no questions, and you are not asking any in this go round. My agenda is seeking a high level of accuracy, and yours is making the pieces fit conclusions you rigidly cling to.

Oh, and by the way I called and recorded my conversation with an officer at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Antonio 210-978-1200. The officer I spoke to informed me he was very familiar with the procedures on handling the old puch out 1963 USPMO's.

His exact words were before sending the batch of PMO's back to the USPS they EACH get recorded and double checked against the USPS forms for acuracy before endorsement. I asked where does the FRB endorse the PMO? I wanted him to tell me, he replied, ALL PMO's get endorsed on the back side usually under the cashing banks endorsement, this should NOW put this to rest.

The postal money order we are discussing was not sending the batch of PMO's back to the USPS, you are describing a then obsolete process obsolete with regard to all postal money orders sold by post offices in Dallas and in Chicago after January 4, 1963. The postal money order under discussion was automatically processed identically to US government checks. It was sent to the Treasurer's ADP system in Washington, DC, not to the USPO money order center in Kansas City.

There is no dispute that my research established as fact that you are describing a process that was obsolete with regard to the postal money order in question. The details you have provided in your post are irrelevant. The purpose of the changes to postal money order design and issuance announced in spring 1962 and established after January 4, 1963 in Dallas and Chicago post offices and throughout the country by later in 1963 was to eliminate the cost of a $600,000 annual contract with regional Federal Reserve Banks to

....before sending the batch of PMO's back to the USPS they EACH get recorded and double checked against the USPS forms for acuracy before endorsement.

I proved that the $21.45 postal money order as well as a money order Oswald purchased on January 5, 1963, serial number ending in 60
were processed automatically and no longer were put through the process by the regional Federal Reserve Banks, which also included manually key punching in machine code the face amount of the money order as a procedure of the obsolete double checked process as you described.

As more often than not, you are woefully ill equipped to contribute more here, Scott, than ill informed or highly emotional and obscenity laced posts.

I laid all this out and you either have not read what I shared with you or you did not comprehend the details.

Scott, do more reading, please.

I presented this thirteen months ago. All of it has been pointed out to Sandy, a year ago.

http://jfk.education/node/12
11/20/2015 - 00:25

......

....and your immediate reply-

Tom, take a breath and relax before trying to put the cart before the horse, I can appreciate you putting up your regular mombo gumbo language as always, however, I don't think anyone would be interested in your 1988 revised Act. And, thus is the reason I put up the 1964 revised act from the Federal Reserve (it self,) it continued from it's 1963 revisions. Please note my very last post in-case you know, you didn't read it!

Scott, if you had actually read and understood the research details I shared with you, you could have been knowledgeable enough to point out to the
San Antonio source you contacted and presented quotes from, to point out the details I am AGAIN sharing with you here; you could have informed
your source that he was describing an obsolete and thus irrelevant FRB postal money order processing sequence because the money order you think
you are researching was issued from a then new, point of sale, print punch, Friden postal money order machine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Probably because the safety measures and security practiced by Federal Reserve banks was so good that those who forged the evidence after the assassination couldn't crack it.

Its a possibility, anythings possible. I mean, after all its kinda like looking for a needle in a heystack. It's like some people take 50 plus years to find what they're looking for while someone else finds it in five minutes, go figure?

Laughable, if your long disruptive record here (your smugness guarantees it) was not made by you so predictably pathetic. Again and again you work
yourself up over issues you indicate you develop no firm grasp of and the outcome is your initial absurdly smug tone descends into obscenity laced, emotional outbursts.