Attack near, and perhaps on Parliament grounds, London

[Peter Lemkin]

I don't see any sign it was false-flag at this point. One can always invent such a scenario, but I think caution not to do so without evidence is important. It makes those of us who work on such things look overly conspiratorial in our thinking, and doesn't reflect reality. There are both real and false-flag attacks in the World today. I like to wait to see how the evidence and story unfolds before making a 'call' on if it was likely a real event done in real anger/revenge or if false-flag. The real ones have no shortage of motive, with so many western countries in and/or supporting others in countries they have no business in, killing and destroying, etc. While if keeping 'score', I'm personally inclined to find that more of these kinds of attacks have at least some element of false-flag within them than not [LIHOP, MIHOP, intelligence connections, etc.], I still think not all have been false-flag and that one needs to be careful before calling one as such - to not alienate the majority of people who find false-flag operations almost too hard to imagine or believe.

One also needs, IMO, to distinguish carefully between completely synthetic false-flag events [which I class 911 in] and partial false-flag events, which are each different, but often involve one or more angry persons wanting to do real harm to citizens or a political structure - but are both willing to be killed [sometimes fooled into it], and manipulated into the MO, timing, location, weapons, explosives, arrest or more likely death, etc. 7/7 was IMO false-flag, likely in part. I'm not saying this one was not, I myself am just being cautious to call it so without more information and disinformation to sift through. I think those who see nothing BUT conspiracy and false-flags in everything do our work and our research community any service. Some may be honestly misguided, some overly zealous and some may be plants to discredit sites like this and researchers/analysts/students of such here and elsewhere.

I'm actually surprised they say only four have died out of the 40 injured, given the images and information I heard and saw...but maybe. Several of the injured are said to be severely injured.

The only possible anomaly I've seen so far is that the person who supposedly drove the car and stabbed the policeman, and who was subsequently shot was said to have been killed, yet there were images of him on a stretcher being given IV fluids and oxygen. Perhaps he died after that photo, although the wording of the police seemed to indicate he was shot dead at once - but such details are far less forthcoming [along with the identity of the person who supposedly committed the attack] than would be true if this had happened in the USA or many other countries.

This event marks exactly to the day the one year mark to one in Belgium.