London attack a false flag

[Peter Lemkin]

What evidence is there of a false flag?

Lack of motive, for one. What did the attacker get from his suicide mission?

Also, early reports of another man in custody, and the texting right before the attack.

While we don't know his motive, one might imagine it was anger at the way the Muslim World has been treated both inside the UK and more so in majority Muslim nations under siege. [i.e., no shortage of motive]. He got: one policeman dead, another wounded; an attack on the centerpiece of UK 'structure'; many other dead and over 40 wounded. We don't yet know what he texted, but so what? It could be anything from 'here goes', to a family member, to someone with what to do to find his will or personal things. I personally didn't hear of another man in custody, although there were reports of two persons involved at the beginning. Hardly evidence of false-flag, just confusion in the early moments. I have seen and called a lot of false-flag attacks, I just don't see it yet with this one. If it turns out someone knew he was going to do this and let it happen, that would be different....or an equivalent scenario.