10-05-2017, 10:13 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-05-2017, 11:21 PM by Scott Kaiser.)
I'm not sure why I posted the above when I meant to post the blow, but that's okay, that still questions the credibility of both Hemming and that guy defending his conversations with Hemming. I believe he's defending more his conversation then Hemming himself, after all that is how one reacts when their full of vanity.
The post I meant to share was;
For the record, it wasn't Weberman, it was Canfield, and... Weitzman's testimony to the Dallas police department, WC and the HSCA including Canfield all remain [identical,] anyone saying otherwise is basing their opinion off their hypothesis, and lastly. My father had Barker's photograph. I'd say, this ties in with what actually happened in Dallas.
The post I meant to share was;
Quote:[FONT=&]can you, or anyone else, say whether or not you have any confidence in Weberman's claim that Seymour Weitzman identified Bernard Barker as a fake Secret Service agent on the Grassy Knoll?[/FONT]
For the record, it wasn't Weberman, it was Canfield, and... Weitzman's testimony to the Dallas police department, WC and the HSCA including Canfield all remain [identical,] anyone saying otherwise is basing their opinion off their hypothesis, and lastly. My father had Barker's photograph. I'd say, this ties in with what actually happened in Dallas.