Julian Assange - UN Rules in His Favour?

[Peter Lemkin]

http://news.met.police.uk/news/statement...nge-242877

Following today's decision by the Director of Public Prosecution, Ms Marianne Ny, in relation to the Swedish authorities investigation into Julian Assange the Metropolitan Police Service's position is:

Westminster Magistrates' Court issued a warrant for the arrest of Julian Assange following him failing to surrender to the court on the 29 June 2012. The Metropolitan Police Service is obliged to execute that warrant should he leave the Embassy.

Whilst Mr Assange was wanted on a European Arrest Warrant (EAW) for an extremely serious offence, the MPS response reflected the serious nature of that crime. Now that the situation has changed and the Swedish authorities have discontinued their investigation into that matter, Mr Assange remains wanted for a much less serious offence. The MPS will provide a level of resourcing which is proportionate to that offence.

The MPS will not comment further on the operational plan.

The priority for the MPS must continue to be arresting those who are currently wanted in the Capital in connection with serious violent or sexual offences for the protection of Londoners.

Assange is NOT wanted for any violent nor sexual offences - only not appearing in court [as he sought and received political asylum]. I'd be willing to bet the number of police outside the Embassy will remain the same. The Brits are in on the US's secret plans to get Assange and see him rot in the U.S. Gulag - if not be executed for 'espionage'. The UK stopped the use of the death penalty in 1965. The US has never ended the death penalty for certain crimes, including 'espionage'. On that basis alone, the UK should refuse to extradite Assange to the US, but they have refused to agree to that or to say if they hold a deportation request from the US. The horrible secret entanglements between the UK and US are obscene and are entanglements between each's secret/deep governmental structures.