03-12-2017, 07:36 PM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Scott:
I don't know what you are talking about, which is a recurrent problem I have with you.
If you have not noticed, the recent research shows that Harvey, who was stationed in Rome at the time of JFK's visit, was in Dallas in November of 1963. Italy was also of interest to Angleton since he lived there for a long time. Both men opposed the Kennedy/Schelsinger 'apertura' (Italian for opening) concept of bringing the socialists into the mainstream. Consequently, the Strategy of Tension countered this quite effectively by a variety of terror type means, perhaps even including train station bombings and the Red Brigades.
As many have suspected for a long time, it is looking more and more like Permindex was a creation of the Agency and its allies to facilitate this campaign. What with Bloomfield enlisting Rockefeller and Rothschild as partners and the discoveries that align with that in Italy that Paz and her author have discovered. Clay Shaw made a serious error in recording this in his Who's Who and then eliminating it after the Kennedy murder.
As per your last comment, I think most people can see the difference between the machinations noted above and in the other places. I don't think Madame Nhu, the Belgians or the Shah were involved in the murder of Kennedy. But it is undeniable that Kennedy's reform foreign policy was seriously altered and then reversed in those places, and others, after he was killed. I for one do not consider that all to be somehow accidental. All one has to do is read the proper literature in the field by writers like Rakove, Mahoney, Muelhenbeck and Poulgrain, among others, to discover those facts. Some of us do read those books because its in the best interest of current scholarship about Kennedy's administration and his foreign policy views. If one thinks, as I do, that he was killed over those views, then its quite natural to explore them and elucidate them. Since both the MSM and our critical community have ignored those initiatives for a very long time.
Thank you very much, Jim. I agree with you, word by word