09-12-2018, 10:34 PM
I believe in the idea that the WTC was going to be condemned for demolition and this would be almost impossibly expensive and disruptive--the anthrax "attack" is all the smoking gun that any conspiracy theorist would ever need.
WTC 7 was demolished for the same reason. It was too big and expensive to demolish efficiently in order to build the replacement WTC complex. Likely, all the other WTC infrastructure was smaller and could be more easily dealt with.
We know that 9-11 is just another Battleship Maine, Lusitania, Pearl Harbor etc etc. etc. This seems obvious to me. If this is an important basic truth, then (sadly) it could be lost in the confusing welter of statistical information about seismic readings, alleged cell phone calls from the planes and factoids about thermite explosives etc. etc. (Conspiracy theorizing should be kept as simple as possible, but it never is).
And the stand-down of the Air Force interceptors is a no-brainer. Nobody would have authorized the shoot-down of a hijacked plane before 9-11-2001. Just wouldn't happen under any circumstances.
James Lateer
WTC 7 was demolished for the same reason. It was too big and expensive to demolish efficiently in order to build the replacement WTC complex. Likely, all the other WTC infrastructure was smaller and could be more easily dealt with.
We know that 9-11 is just another Battleship Maine, Lusitania, Pearl Harbor etc etc. etc. This seems obvious to me. If this is an important basic truth, then (sadly) it could be lost in the confusing welter of statistical information about seismic readings, alleged cell phone calls from the planes and factoids about thermite explosives etc. etc. (Conspiracy theorizing should be kept as simple as possible, but it never is).
And the stand-down of the Air Force interceptors is a no-brainer. Nobody would have authorized the shoot-down of a hijacked plane before 9-11-2001. Just wouldn't happen under any circumstances.
James Lateer