04-04-2019, 10:11 PM
James Lateer Wrote:John: I just read some (IMHO) ignorant posts on education forum maligning your efforts in the Bloomfield case. Your critics (excluding Mr. Lemkin) are "mind-reading" in regards to your motives or the authenticity of your work. That is a very bad character flaw and Senator Joseph McCarthy was the all-time best "mind-reader" and a jerk, too (IMHO).
I would compare your approach (with which I am totally in agreement), to that of Donald H. Carpenter in his research of Clay Shaw in his book Man of a Million Fragments. Carpenter just kept to the facts in the papers of Shaw.
I know you have to be extremely conservative in any conclusions you draw because that is just what you have to do when delving through personal papers in an archive. My only comparable experience with that was going through the 110 file folders of James Dombrowski at the Wisconsin Historical Society on behalf of Dr. Jeffrey Caufield (who wrote the book General Walker...). If you want the cooperation of the archivists, you can't just peddle paranoid beliefs based on their papers. Plus, the papers tend to speak for themselves.
Salting in wild claims just detracts from the import of the papers in the (narrow) minds of the readers. That said, I would suggest that you seek any and all information from followers about what might be in the papers which might point you in a valuable direction.
In the following link, you will find mention of the Sonneborn group which is set out the book The Bomb In The Basement by Michael Karpin. The book mentions Samuel Zachs as a fellow member of the Sonneborn Group as well as Bloomfield. The Sonneborn group, although organized in New York, described itself as an "international" group (because it also included some prominent Canadians).
IMHO this arrangement is pretty much unique. I can't think of any other such group combining Canadians and Americans. And I am familiar with quite a few pseudo-intelligence groups like the Anti-Bolshevik Nations group, etc. etc.etc. which involved people like Judge Robert Morris and Senate staffer David M. Martin (and the American Security Council).
https://books.google.com/books?id=EYoOCk...rn&f=false
The question is did you find any correspondence with Samuel Zachs? And more important, what papers did you find regarding any membership or cooperation with international Zionist groups wishing to support Israel?
Bloomfield's activities in the Sonneborn group seems to lend credibility to the Dope, Inc. and Lyndon LaRouche material when they connect Bloomfield to Zionist activities. Personally, I think that the LaRouche information is CIA disinformation and I have a detailed chapter in my book The Three Barons which explains the connection between LaRouche and the JFK disinformation activity and CIA disinformation.
Reading between the lines, your extensive discussion of Albert Osborne (when you suggested your suspicion that he might have been a spy for the UK) seems to be a back-door way of suggesting that Bloomfield was possibly a UK spy. Or at least that's the way it came across to me.
Canada had no intelligence agency until June of 1984. Therefore, internal security matters in the WWII era and the 1950's and 1960's were handled by the RCMP. So then you have the question of whether there was any correspondence from Bloomfield to or from the RCMP, especially regarding fascists, communists, etc.?
Regarding the WWII North American internal security problem, there are two excellent books by Raymond Batvinis. He describes in detail the cooperation at the highest level in WWII between J Edgar Hoover and the RCMP. It would seem to me that Bloomfield would have surely had a role in North American internal security, especially when one reads the book about (UK spy) William Stephenson and the BSC. Of course, Stephenson had 300 employees in the US during WWII, but he took all of his records to Canada and burned them after WWII.
The education forum people refer to a Bloomfield letter involving Isadore G Alk who had a background in "Trading With The Enemy" issues. That also points to Bloomfield working on North American internal security in the WWII period. That would also tend to connect Bloomfield to the I G Farben lawsuit involving JFK, RFK and the brother-in-law, the fascist-connected Prince Radziwill.
As I mention in The Three Barons, there is information from Thomas Purvis on the internet which connects Clay Shaw to the IG Farben Case. It was by far the biggest "Trading With The Enemy" case at that time. And of course you also have Prescott Bush involved in "Trading With The Enemy" activity in the WWII era.
Please continue keeping Deep Politics Forum up-to-date on your latest discoveries. You are at the forefront of JFK assassination discoveries right now (IMHO).
James Lateer
James:
Thank you for your kind comments about my work. There is someone on the Education Forum who has made some nasty comments about me but I will not let that stop me from posting my views.
Am very careful about what I say and I prefer to let the documents speak for themselves. There is a lot of information out there about JFK's assassination but not all of it is true.
There is not much correspondence between Bloomfield and the RCMP except for his complaint about Larouche, and I did not see any letters addressed to Samuel Zacks.
Have made a note of the books you mentioned and am especially interested in the one about RCMP and the FBI. When NARA released its documents in 2017 I was saw a lot of requests for information sent from the FBI to the RCMP. I have also requested all of the RCMP JFK investigative files. The files they sent me were small in number so no doubt they held back many of them.
Bloomfield's collection does have material pertaining to a number of Zionist and Jewish organizations. Do not have copies of these documents.
The Bernard that Bloomfield is referring to in the letter is not prince Bernhard but his brother Bernard.
How was James Dombrowski associated with the Walker shooting?