30-05-2023, 03:22 PM
A prime example of how the Education Forum destroyed credible research is seen in Roger Odisio's post on the Forum in reaction to the New York Post doing an article on the original Nix Film...Odisio added that the original Wiegman & Darnell films would aid in finding out if Prayer Man was Lee Harvey Oswald...The Education Forum moderators and its members allowed Odisio to post this without challenge and in doing so allowed Odisio to ignore the firm proof that Prayer Man was Sarah Stanton...JFK research websites don't really operate by Peer Review and rigor...They operate by an established insider group of regulars who develop a sort of license to violate the norms of evidence...What rules the Education Forum is the fact the membership backed the false Prayer Man theory by a 95% majority...It was the site's most popular theory...So in this case the unspoken rule of the clique going by whatever they want whenever they decide applies and a whole hard fought case of evidence can be ignored as long as you are a member of the clique...So, typically, the clique ends up doing exactly what the government insider's club that killed Kennedy did and completes the grand circle of hypocrisy...Clique membership isn't for nothing and there is high value in being able to get out of what you ban and moderate others for at will...A clique member is allowed to ban, censor, and ignore those who present correct evidence while operating under a website that says it doesn't do that...That's why they have the clique...They are using the real offenses of the government in the Kennedy assassination as an excuse to commit their own...This whole process has been brought to its full fruition on the Education Forum by its overseers and membership...Roger Odisio is an ROKC site member who is proxying for Greg Parker...Greg Parker invented the Prayer Man theory...
Because of this primitive attack on good research Odisio will never be informed that Prayer Man has already been proven to be Sarah Stanton by myself...No Education Forum member will ever inform Odisio that the original Wiegman Film he calls for will show Sarah Stanton's face on Prayer Man exactly like Chris Davidson discovered...No Education Forum member will ever tell Odisio that the reason this is important is because once you produce the exact same results from the original film then that proves that Davidson's enhancement is accurate and does legitimately represent what is seen on Wiegman's original celluloid...All the JFK research community is showing here is that it dishonestly needs to exclude and ignore the proof that Prayer Man is Stanton in order to make its case that Prayer Man is Oswald...The community is unfortunately showing its incompetence and corruption in doing so...Unqualified individuals are running the program and they are lowering the Peer Review standards to meet their deficiencies...
A good example is Sandy Larsen...Sandy did an excellent high quality photo analysis of Couch/Darnell, proving beyond a doubt that Lovelady was one of the two men walking up the Elm St extension...Sandy had matched the plaid bars on that man's shirt precisely to that of Lovelady in other images...However, Larsen then read my analysis of Frazier speaking to Sarah Stanton after Calvery shouted the president has been shot and realized that by proving the man was Lovelady he had inadvertently proven the timing that meant Frazier was talking to Stanton at that precise time...One look at Couch/Darnell shows Frazier standing and talking to Prayer Man at that exact instant - therefore proving Prayer Man is Stanton...Larsen knew he had refuted his own Prayer Man theory so what he did was he went back to the Education Forum and deleted his photo analysis...The whole board saw that photo analysis and its proof that the man on the extension was Lovelady...Those same people never said a word to now-administrator Larsen who uses crooked methods to delete evidence that refutes him...Larsen also applied his skill to identifying Gloria Calvery on the front steps in Darnell...This correct identification also proves the timing that places Stanton in the Prayer Man spot...I have never seen Larsen mention his discovery of Gloria Calvery on the steps since...All of this is proof that the Education Forum is centered not around credible discussion of conspiracy evidence...This is proof that the main emphasis of the Forum and its members is avoidance of correct conspiracy evidence by means of an insider clique who control the moderation...It is not the Lone Nutter members of the Education Forum who are perpetrating this...It is squarely a core insider group of persons who identify as Conspiracy Theorists who are egotistically guarding their defective pet theories and maintaining a substandard status quo...It has created a bizarre situation where the best and brightest and their best evidence are unwelcome and met with irrational hostility - facts be damned...
No credible website would disallow this conversation...It should be had on the Education Forum without its facts being prevented by false claims of bad manners...And then the violators who are ignoring it should be made to answer...THAT is where the moderation is needed and NOT against the victim...
No credible website would answer this with silence...
Because of this primitive attack on good research Odisio will never be informed that Prayer Man has already been proven to be Sarah Stanton by myself...No Education Forum member will ever inform Odisio that the original Wiegman Film he calls for will show Sarah Stanton's face on Prayer Man exactly like Chris Davidson discovered...No Education Forum member will ever tell Odisio that the reason this is important is because once you produce the exact same results from the original film then that proves that Davidson's enhancement is accurate and does legitimately represent what is seen on Wiegman's original celluloid...All the JFK research community is showing here is that it dishonestly needs to exclude and ignore the proof that Prayer Man is Stanton in order to make its case that Prayer Man is Oswald...The community is unfortunately showing its incompetence and corruption in doing so...Unqualified individuals are running the program and they are lowering the Peer Review standards to meet their deficiencies...
A good example is Sandy Larsen...Sandy did an excellent high quality photo analysis of Couch/Darnell, proving beyond a doubt that Lovelady was one of the two men walking up the Elm St extension...Sandy had matched the plaid bars on that man's shirt precisely to that of Lovelady in other images...However, Larsen then read my analysis of Frazier speaking to Sarah Stanton after Calvery shouted the president has been shot and realized that by proving the man was Lovelady he had inadvertently proven the timing that meant Frazier was talking to Stanton at that precise time...One look at Couch/Darnell shows Frazier standing and talking to Prayer Man at that exact instant - therefore proving Prayer Man is Stanton...Larsen knew he had refuted his own Prayer Man theory so what he did was he went back to the Education Forum and deleted his photo analysis...The whole board saw that photo analysis and its proof that the man on the extension was Lovelady...Those same people never said a word to now-administrator Larsen who uses crooked methods to delete evidence that refutes him...Larsen also applied his skill to identifying Gloria Calvery on the front steps in Darnell...This correct identification also proves the timing that places Stanton in the Prayer Man spot...I have never seen Larsen mention his discovery of Gloria Calvery on the steps since...All of this is proof that the Education Forum is centered not around credible discussion of conspiracy evidence...This is proof that the main emphasis of the Forum and its members is avoidance of correct conspiracy evidence by means of an insider clique who control the moderation...It is not the Lone Nutter members of the Education Forum who are perpetrating this...It is squarely a core insider group of persons who identify as Conspiracy Theorists who are egotistically guarding their defective pet theories and maintaining a substandard status quo...It has created a bizarre situation where the best and brightest and their best evidence are unwelcome and met with irrational hostility - facts be damned...
No credible website would disallow this conversation...It should be had on the Education Forum without its facts being prevented by false claims of bad manners...And then the violators who are ignoring it should be made to answer...THAT is where the moderation is needed and NOT against the victim...
No credible website would answer this with silence...