26-06-2023, 04:46 PM
My response to Gil Jesus' Education Forum-defending post on Alt.Conspiracy.JFK...
The Deep Politics Forum was formed in order to combat the outrageous violation of research standards Gil commits in his Why "Prayerman" is NOT Sarah Stanton thread...Gil is using the Education Forum and its corrupted management as justification to ignore my evidence that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...If I'm not mistaken, that used to be a violation of DPF rules (that all members and moderators were subjected to by site rule):
Your thinking you are above answering my evidence is a pure example of the rotten double standard being practiced in the JFK internet research community...You also fail to see the irony in the fact that there is a reverse standard on the JFK internet that is run out of the Education Forum where Mickey Mouse hacks like yourself, who aren't afraid to basically troll in front of the best cutting-edge evidence on the subject, are welcomed as members while a serious researcher who argues seriously and is the best expert on the subject is disallowed from the website with focused energy...Yes, that is my point exactly that a person who is low enough, intellectually, to call for discussion on the Prayer Man subject and then give that answer in response to the best arguments on the subject, is a favored, unquestioned member on the Education Forum while there is a concentrated effort to remove myself from all JFK research venues and destroy me as a researcher...
When I was removed from the Education Forum by James Gordon in 2016 he said it was because I had been told the proper research methodology and failed to do what I was told...That, of course, was an outright lie and it was actually the Prayer Man people he was openly favoring as moderator that were guilty of that offense...After all, since I was the only member posting the correct evidence on Prayer Man, showing that Prayer Man was Sarah Stanton, how could I be guilty of not following Gordon's ill-defined methodological complaint that he refused to show any examples of?...Your cowardly, juvenile response here, Gil, is yet another example of the obscene travesty being conducted by the Prayer Man-hijacked research community...A clear expert who is many orders of magnitude superior in research ability is insulted and his evidence is trolled and ignored, while an apparent sh*t-heel and hack like yourself gets away with research murder and then justifies it by Education Forum membership to boot - even though that justification serves as a pure example of the corruption of the JFK research community that I have been pointing-out...Even with this situation being shown in broad daylight right here in this thread, over on the Education Forum James Gordon is still getting away with calling himself a credible moderator and is still enforcing that obscenely outrageous ban against my self for the crime of posting the correct Prayer Man evidence...
When I re-applied for membership at the Forum last fall the decision was kicked-out to Mark Knight who promptly did what he does on every moderator decision and came in in favor of Gordon...Knight never once commented on the travesty the Forum was committing in relation to the actual evidence...Knight said that he wasn't familiar with the reason for the original banning but he had determined that I was a "shit-poster", similar to Greg Parker, who "was not able to play nicely with others"...Knight was doing what Gordon and Beckett had obviously dog whistled to him and was simply reinforcing Gordon like he does each and every time...So being a member of that forum is not necessarily a good thing under these circumstances, seeing how the moderation seems to think its purpose is enforcing terribly unjust bannings and defamation of innocent researchers for the crime of having skill...Which is why this thread needs to be brought to to the Education Forum for FAIR review instead of the automatic Gordon-favoring decisions that come from Beckett and Knight...
All Gil is doing is what every pathetic guilty party does when proven guilty but they know they have a corrupted court that will find in their favor...These people have taken over the Conspiracy research world and they are destroying innocent researchers all so they can maintain their clique...Apparently the moderators are allowed to call innocent people "shit-posters" yet others are banned for it...The moderators on the Education Forum are equating holding people to correct evidence (like they are supposed to be doing) as a rules violation and not getting along with others...It is actually the moderators of that forum who are in violation and Gordon is making sure no one ever gets the chance to show it...
The Deep Politics Forum was formed in order to combat the outrageous violation of research standards Gil commits in his Why "Prayerman" is NOT Sarah Stanton thread...Gil is using the Education Forum and its corrupted management as justification to ignore my evidence that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...If I'm not mistaken, that used to be a violation of DPF rules (that all members and moderators were subjected to by site rule):
Your thinking you are above answering my evidence is a pure example of the rotten double standard being practiced in the JFK internet research community...You also fail to see the irony in the fact that there is a reverse standard on the JFK internet that is run out of the Education Forum where Mickey Mouse hacks like yourself, who aren't afraid to basically troll in front of the best cutting-edge evidence on the subject, are welcomed as members while a serious researcher who argues seriously and is the best expert on the subject is disallowed from the website with focused energy...Yes, that is my point exactly that a person who is low enough, intellectually, to call for discussion on the Prayer Man subject and then give that answer in response to the best arguments on the subject, is a favored, unquestioned member on the Education Forum while there is a concentrated effort to remove myself from all JFK research venues and destroy me as a researcher...
When I was removed from the Education Forum by James Gordon in 2016 he said it was because I had been told the proper research methodology and failed to do what I was told...That, of course, was an outright lie and it was actually the Prayer Man people he was openly favoring as moderator that were guilty of that offense...After all, since I was the only member posting the correct evidence on Prayer Man, showing that Prayer Man was Sarah Stanton, how could I be guilty of not following Gordon's ill-defined methodological complaint that he refused to show any examples of?...Your cowardly, juvenile response here, Gil, is yet another example of the obscene travesty being conducted by the Prayer Man-hijacked research community...A clear expert who is many orders of magnitude superior in research ability is insulted and his evidence is trolled and ignored, while an apparent sh*t-heel and hack like yourself gets away with research murder and then justifies it by Education Forum membership to boot - even though that justification serves as a pure example of the corruption of the JFK research community that I have been pointing-out...Even with this situation being shown in broad daylight right here in this thread, over on the Education Forum James Gordon is still getting away with calling himself a credible moderator and is still enforcing that obscenely outrageous ban against my self for the crime of posting the correct Prayer Man evidence...
When I re-applied for membership at the Forum last fall the decision was kicked-out to Mark Knight who promptly did what he does on every moderator decision and came in in favor of Gordon...Knight never once commented on the travesty the Forum was committing in relation to the actual evidence...Knight said that he wasn't familiar with the reason for the original banning but he had determined that I was a "shit-poster", similar to Greg Parker, who "was not able to play nicely with others"...Knight was doing what Gordon and Beckett had obviously dog whistled to him and was simply reinforcing Gordon like he does each and every time...So being a member of that forum is not necessarily a good thing under these circumstances, seeing how the moderation seems to think its purpose is enforcing terribly unjust bannings and defamation of innocent researchers for the crime of having skill...Which is why this thread needs to be brought to to the Education Forum for FAIR review instead of the automatic Gordon-favoring decisions that come from Beckett and Knight...
All Gil is doing is what every pathetic guilty party does when proven guilty but they know they have a corrupted court that will find in their favor...These people have taken over the Conspiracy research world and they are destroying innocent researchers all so they can maintain their clique...Apparently the moderators are allowed to call innocent people "shit-posters" yet others are banned for it...The moderators on the Education Forum are equating holding people to correct evidence (like they are supposed to be doing) as a rules violation and not getting along with others...It is actually the moderators of that forum who are in violation and Gordon is making sure no one ever gets the chance to show it...