27-06-2023, 04:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-07-2023, 04:20 AM by Brian Doyle.)
The Conspiracy community has allowed Greg Parker to break their previous level of research integrity and destroy good Kennedy assassination evidence discussion on the internet...Fetzer and Cinque also added their part, however the main cause is Greg Parker and his Prayer Man theory - which led to a rift in the Conspiracy community and subsequent silence as far as productive discussion...Ignoring good evidence is now preferred over skilled research...
If you go to the Alt.Conspiracy.JFK website you will see Gil Jesus take the lead from Parker and his proxies and post that Sarah Stanton cannot be Prayer Man...If you read my reply to Gil Jesus you will see that there is just no comparison between our material...My analysis is comprehensive and proves several times over that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...There is just no doubt about it by normal research standards (that seem not to apply to myself)...Gil does this because he's just not a very good researcher and is running with the crowd for acceptance (like most Prayer Man posters)...
Gil gets away with that because the Kennedy internet is run by an insider's group that are all friends and automatically approve of certain researchers despite the serious flaws in their offerings...In any case there is no doubt that 10 years ago it was understood that this website was formed to cut through that BS and be a safe place for skilled researchers who were unfairly treated elsewhere in the Kennedy research world to have a safe sanctuary to prove their evidence...If that premise were actually practiced a person like me would be hailed like a hero for proving the DPF's ethos and carrying out its purpose against the Education Forum and its corrupted moderatorship...The DPF produced a member who was capable of single-handedly going in and disproving the Prayer Man theory and therefore doing everything the DPF was designed for by bringing JFK research away from the cranks and bogus theory-makers and back to credibility...
Their silence, and therefore acquiescence to the Education Forum's malfeasance, is a capitulation by the research community to Greg Parker and the Education Forum and a choosing between good research and the clique...This is a betrayal and it is simply unforgiveable that a person could endure so much, and produce such important evidence, and the result is hostile rejection from the people who describe themselves as being the hosts of such research...The research world has chosen popular egos over good research and there is no excuse for it...They have no shame over their silence and therefore consent to Greg Parker and the Education Forum's disruption of good research...The current low point we are at in the Kennedy research world is directly trace-able to Greg Parker and the community's foolish backing of his bogus Prayer Man theory...Attacking and ignoring the person who disproved Parker's bogus theory, and responding by eliminating skilled vetting-type discussions of evidence, is only giving Parker a victory for his mischief and allowing him to take down the entire productive research world...Shame to those who enforce that from false positions of authority...
Time to return the JFK research community to credible Peer Review and end the era of silly website "research"...
If you go to the Alt.Conspiracy.JFK website you will see Gil Jesus take the lead from Parker and his proxies and post that Sarah Stanton cannot be Prayer Man...If you read my reply to Gil Jesus you will see that there is just no comparison between our material...My analysis is comprehensive and proves several times over that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...There is just no doubt about it by normal research standards (that seem not to apply to myself)...Gil does this because he's just not a very good researcher and is running with the crowd for acceptance (like most Prayer Man posters)...
Gil gets away with that because the Kennedy internet is run by an insider's group that are all friends and automatically approve of certain researchers despite the serious flaws in their offerings...In any case there is no doubt that 10 years ago it was understood that this website was formed to cut through that BS and be a safe place for skilled researchers who were unfairly treated elsewhere in the Kennedy research world to have a safe sanctuary to prove their evidence...If that premise were actually practiced a person like me would be hailed like a hero for proving the DPF's ethos and carrying out its purpose against the Education Forum and its corrupted moderatorship...The DPF produced a member who was capable of single-handedly going in and disproving the Prayer Man theory and therefore doing everything the DPF was designed for by bringing JFK research away from the cranks and bogus theory-makers and back to credibility...
Their silence, and therefore acquiescence to the Education Forum's malfeasance, is a capitulation by the research community to Greg Parker and the Education Forum and a choosing between good research and the clique...This is a betrayal and it is simply unforgiveable that a person could endure so much, and produce such important evidence, and the result is hostile rejection from the people who describe themselves as being the hosts of such research...The research world has chosen popular egos over good research and there is no excuse for it...They have no shame over their silence and therefore consent to Greg Parker and the Education Forum's disruption of good research...The current low point we are at in the Kennedy research world is directly trace-able to Greg Parker and the community's foolish backing of his bogus Prayer Man theory...Attacking and ignoring the person who disproved Parker's bogus theory, and responding by eliminating skilled vetting-type discussions of evidence, is only giving Parker a victory for his mischief and allowing him to take down the entire productive research world...Shame to those who enforce that from false positions of authority...
Time to return the JFK research community to credible Peer Review and end the era of silly website "research"...