19-08-2023, 03:49 PM
It can be accurately said that the silence of the credible research community is directly responsible for the dysfunction that currently hampers the JFK research community...
That silence is based on personal affinity to certain main researchers and their irrational attachment to the Prayer Man theory despite the facts...
The failure to publicly recognize the correct evidence on the Prayer Man issue has led directly to the Greg Parker-types gaining momentum and control of the JFK research community and internet...Jim DiEugenio praises that victory by Parker and his wrong claims...
The credible research community is guilty of causing this with their failure to come forth according to their own rules and their preference to run the research community through friendships instead of self-disciplined academic rules...These persons have violated the most basic of rules by making the JFK internet an extension of themselves and their own personal likes rather than the objective research forums described by their rules...Forums that state they are there for the perpetuation of correct evidence that then shun and discourage that very correct evidence are responsible for pushing JFK research in to a state of uncredible-ness...Notoriety or reputation does not precede credible evidence and any community that does so is causing its own failure...Responding to this with silence is only reinforcing that failure...
Time for the community to follow its own rules...
That silence is based on personal affinity to certain main researchers and their irrational attachment to the Prayer Man theory despite the facts...
The failure to publicly recognize the correct evidence on the Prayer Man issue has led directly to the Greg Parker-types gaining momentum and control of the JFK research community and internet...Jim DiEugenio praises that victory by Parker and his wrong claims...
The credible research community is guilty of causing this with their failure to come forth according to their own rules and their preference to run the research community through friendships instead of self-disciplined academic rules...These persons have violated the most basic of rules by making the JFK internet an extension of themselves and their own personal likes rather than the objective research forums described by their rules...Forums that state they are there for the perpetuation of correct evidence that then shun and discourage that very correct evidence are responsible for pushing JFK research in to a state of uncredible-ness...Notoriety or reputation does not precede credible evidence and any community that does so is causing its own failure...Responding to this with silence is only reinforcing that failure...
Time for the community to follow its own rules...