09-11-2009, 12:03 PM
Just how do you accrue a "liability" of almost three quarters of a billion pounds "off balance sheet"? Usually such OBS items are contingent liabilities and have to be noted in the accounts (unless things have changed in the last 20 odd years).
This altogether sounds very fishy indeed - and the whiff of money laundering - as described by former Mafia financier Michele Sindona - is twitching at my nose.
And if RBS is the unnamed creditor does this suggest that they held their contra amount deeply off balance sheet too - as it can't have got lost in their accounts also, as the UK government has been all over them over the last year. Haven't they?
http://themessagenetwork.biz/?p=19918
Wel, old Bill's SFO are so politically controlled that this will probably die a quiet death - but it does seem to suggest that a Brit bank is involved in the above.
This altogether sounds very fishy indeed - and the whiff of money laundering - as described by former Mafia financier Michele Sindona - is twitching at my nose.
And if RBS is the unnamed creditor does this suggest that they held their contra amount deeply off balance sheet too - as it can't have got lost in their accounts also, as the UK government has been all over them over the last year. Haven't they?
http://themessagenetwork.biz/?p=19918
Quote:The Serious Fraud Office in the UK is also probing links between the Icelandic banks and London, although it has not launched a formal investigation.
Wel, old Bill's SFO are so politically controlled that this will probably die a quiet death - but it does seem to suggest that a Brit bank is involved in the above.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14