Larouche Role in Obama Health Care plan

[Gary McGowan]

I hadn't seen this post when I replied to Jan just above.

In other words LaRouche corroborates LaRouche.

...or LL and colleagues make their arguments better than I've been able to.

...the British National Health System is not a "Corporation" in the sense you mean (usually charaterized by limited liability, the issuance of shares and operating for profit). On the contrary, the NHS is taxpayer funded, is not for profit and a very great majority of Brits cherich it and despise the thought the business elites are trying to privatize it.

Yeah. Americans kinda liked the taxpayer funded Hill-Burton system too, before Nixon administration and finding themselves with this privatized HMO crap. (It's past 1:30 a.m. I'm painting in broad strokes.)

Ergo your argument that the word fascist means "Bullying by the corporate elite" does not fit pretty close at all.

Well, except for the fact that I had said, "LaRouche and colleagues have never said nor intended to imply that the British NHS is an inherently fascist system." The corporate elite is bullying American domestic policy. Actually, financier elite might be a better term; then, to my way of thinking, it could apply to U.K. policy too--but you folks can do as you please with your health care. Just please keep Tony Blair and his buddies on the island and out of U.S. affairs.

LaRouche and co-conspirators DO support their views with proof and evidence. You just refuse to engage it.

But I see this discussion is going to go exactly nowhere

It may well be that the behavioral economists who are advising their narcissistic little puppet, Obama, would have slipped their spiffy advisory panel (accountable to nobody--certainly not American citizens) in really smoothly by now had not LaRouche intervened. To me, that's "getting somewhere," albeit a small step.


A little history, just for fun:
The Franklin School Starts Modern England, by Anton Chaitkin
.