22-01-2010, 06:06 PM
It is reasonable to infer that narco-trafficking is an element that provides cover, funds, and deniability, given the prior work of Peter Dale Scott, Alfred McCoy and others.
I appreciate the controversy about HAARP; that such capability is desired or in development has been mentioned by Alvin Toffler and Michael Crichton. I am not sufficiently learned from a scientific and engineering basis to make the case, or refute it. I would guess many here are familiar with Nick Begich's book, and his connection to other events in past 'deep politics'.
However, there is enough independent corroboration now (much of it posted above) of the intent of the USA to make good use of the event. The doctrine of chaos and shock are well-described elsewhere. It is pointed out elsewhere that the British pulled its fleet away from that area prior to the event, that the social networking system which would be used to communicate within the humanitarian/military response was activated before the event, that multiple Caribbean islands have been or are being transformed into military outposts (the Netherlands Antilles and Trinidad, for example), and that Obama has just given the okay for economic warfare against Venezuela, and Venezuela has already alleged overflights by UAV's. I am aware also of the directives toward weather modification as one element of "full-spectrum domination".
One of the books I am currently reading (and I will dictate and post critical excerpts and supporting follow-up in the near future) is James Douglass' "JFK and the Unspeakable". [Critical parts of his 1972 book "Resistance and Contemplation" are already available at my own web site.] I refer you specifically to page 33 of "the Unspeakable" which lays bare the language and intent of NSC 10/2, a machinery prepared in the tightest secrecy, a topic broadly available in text and discussion on the Internet, which allow "almost unlimited" covert operations.
Says Douglass:
Little is allowed to interfere with it, including Presidents, journalism, Senators, the people, or the truth.
NSC 10/2 has cognitively infiltrated the entire American state and culture.
I appreciate the controversy about HAARP; that such capability is desired or in development has been mentioned by Alvin Toffler and Michael Crichton. I am not sufficiently learned from a scientific and engineering basis to make the case, or refute it. I would guess many here are familiar with Nick Begich's book, and his connection to other events in past 'deep politics'.
However, there is enough independent corroboration now (much of it posted above) of the intent of the USA to make good use of the event. The doctrine of chaos and shock are well-described elsewhere. It is pointed out elsewhere that the British pulled its fleet away from that area prior to the event, that the social networking system which would be used to communicate within the humanitarian/military response was activated before the event, that multiple Caribbean islands have been or are being transformed into military outposts (the Netherlands Antilles and Trinidad, for example), and that Obama has just given the okay for economic warfare against Venezuela, and Venezuela has already alleged overflights by UAV's. I am aware also of the directives toward weather modification as one element of "full-spectrum domination".
One of the books I am currently reading (and I will dictate and post critical excerpts and supporting follow-up in the near future) is James Douglass' "JFK and the Unspeakable". [Critical parts of his 1972 book "Resistance and Contemplation" are already available at my own web site.] I refer you specifically to page 33 of "the Unspeakable" which lays bare the language and intent of NSC 10/2, a machinery prepared in the tightest secrecy, a topic broadly available in text and discussion on the Internet, which allow "almost unlimited" covert operations.
Says Douglass:
Quote:Since NSC10/2 authorized violations of international law, it also established official lying as their indispensable cover. All such activities had to be "so planned and executed that any US governmental responsibility for them is not evident to unauthorized persons, and that if uncovered the US government can plausibly deny any responsibility for them." The national security doctrine of "plausible deniability" combined in line with hypocrisy. It marked the creation of a Frankenstein monster.Everything in our national security state is dedicated to what is described in a different source as 'an expansive conception of [America's] security requirements to include a world substantially made over in its own image.'
Little is allowed to interfere with it, including Presidents, journalism, Senators, the people, or the truth.
NSC 10/2 has cognitively infiltrated the entire American state and culture.
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"