"A Terrible Mistake" by H. P. Albarelli, Jr. - JFK Assassination

[Charles Drago]

Lee Harvey Oswald can ONLY be analyzed in terms investigated
for 12 years by John Armstrong and set forth with proofs in his
masterful 1000 page book plus CD...HARVEY & LEE.

Jack

I don't disagree. Armstrong's book is very good. An excellent and factual touchstone for consultation before leaping into the void. But there is much more to be learned about Oswald that goes well beyond the noble reaches of Mr. Armstrong (thus far), otherwise there would be no need for this discussion or this site, or any other. Oswald is an enigma the begs far more attention, scrutiny, and analysis. At present, there isn't much of anything anyone can say with certainty about Oswald.

I'm with Hank on this one.

Jack, Armstrong's work does not require the "ONLY" distinction to reinforce its self-evident significance. It is grand work indeed -- but does not come close to revealing the psychological depths of its subject(s), the historical and broadly cultural antecedents and inspirations for the operations it considers, the identities and larger goals of the puppet masters ...

If you mean that, absent acknowledgment and appreciation of the legitimacy of Armstrong's core hypothesis, studies of LHO ultimately will prove inadequate, then we've found common ground.

But Harvey and Lee could not have been created in a vacuum, and it must not be thought of as the "final word" on anything.