23-02-2010, 02:42 PM
There's at least one part of that Global Research article by Gordon Thomas (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=17713)and referenced by Mark in the previous post that supports Austin's original point about Thomas's reliability. It concerns the assassination of Gerald Bull:
Magda's thread about Stephan Koch here suggests a plausible alternative. I was so intrigued by that thread that I bought a copy of Gerald James's book 'In the Public Interest' and have just finished reading it. James became deeply enmeshed in events leading to the 'Arms to Iraq' scandal through the mid-late eighties and early nineties. He was the Chairman of Astra Holdings throughout and knew Gerald Bull personally. Bull's was not the only assassination with deep connections to UK involvement in that arms trade. Belgian 'Minister of State' Andre Cools and investigative reporter Jonathan Moyle were two other obvious ones and there were several other highly suspicious, premature unexplained deaths. More on Moyle in another of Magda's threads here
In short MI6, the eyes, ears, facilitators and enforcers of UK Deep State interests were undoubtedly relieved at the early demise of all those players and were as well placed as any organisation to ensure they occurred.
So, contrary to Gordon Thomas's dogmatic version, there are other possibilities with more substantial motive and capability which he does not even mention. Hmmmm.
Quote:Within the global intelligence community, respect for Mossad grew following the kidon assassination of Dr Gerald Bull, the Canadian scientist who was probably the world's greatest expert on gun-barrel ballistics. Israel had made several attempts to buy his expertise. Each time, Bull had made clear his dislike for the Jewish state.The BIG problem with all that is that it is presented as the definitive version of what happened, whereas it is far from certain that Mossad were the prime movers - or even the trigger men.
Instead he had offered his services to Saddam Hussein, to build a super-gun capable of launching shells containing nuclear, chemical or biological warheads directly from Iraq into Israel. Saddam had ordered three of the weapons at a cost of $20 million. Bull was retained as a consultant for a fee of $1 million.
On the afternoon of March 20, 1990, the sanction to kill Bull was given by the then prime minister, Yitzhak Shamir. Nahum Admoni, the head of Mossad, sent a three-man team to Brussels, where Bull lived in a luxury apartment block. Each kidon carried a handgun in a holster under his jacket.
When the 61-year-old Bull answered the doorbell of his home, he was shot five times in the head and the neck, each kidon firing their 7.65 pistol in turn, leaving Bull dead on his doorstep. An hour later they were out of the country on a flight to Tel Aviv.
Within hours, Mossad's own department of psychological warfare had arranged with sayanim in the European media to leak stories that Bull had been shot by Saddam's hit squad because he had planned to renege on their deal.
Magda's thread about Stephan Koch here suggests a plausible alternative. I was so intrigued by that thread that I bought a copy of Gerald James's book 'In the Public Interest' and have just finished reading it. James became deeply enmeshed in events leading to the 'Arms to Iraq' scandal through the mid-late eighties and early nineties. He was the Chairman of Astra Holdings throughout and knew Gerald Bull personally. Bull's was not the only assassination with deep connections to UK involvement in that arms trade. Belgian 'Minister of State' Andre Cools and investigative reporter Jonathan Moyle were two other obvious ones and there were several other highly suspicious, premature unexplained deaths. More on Moyle in another of Magda's threads here
In short MI6, the eyes, ears, facilitators and enforcers of UK Deep State interests were undoubtedly relieved at the early demise of all those players and were as well placed as any organisation to ensure they occurred.
So, contrary to Gordon Thomas's dogmatic version, there are other possibilities with more substantial motive and capability which he does not even mention. Hmmmm.
Peter Presland
".....there is something far worse than Nazism, and that is the hubris of the Anglo-American fraternities, whose routine is to incite indigenous monsters to war, and steer the pandemonium to further their imperial aims"
Guido Preparata. Preface to 'Conjuring Hitler'[size=12][size=12]
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Claud Cockburn
[/SIZE][/SIZE]
".....there is something far worse than Nazism, and that is the hubris of the Anglo-American fraternities, whose routine is to incite indigenous monsters to war, and steer the pandemonium to further their imperial aims"
Guido Preparata. Preface to 'Conjuring Hitler'[size=12][size=12]
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Claud Cockburn
[/SIZE][/SIZE]