23-02-2010, 11:41 PM
(This post was last modified: 24-02-2010, 03:41 AM by Charles Drago.)
The creation and promotion of false sponsors for the JFK hit is a critical component of the ongoing cover-up.
These goals are accomplished by conspirators and by their sometimes willing, sometimes deluded (sometimes both) executioners -- the ideologues.
The core values of this thread's initial content are many and varied. Its conclusions are bereft of logic, insight, and context.
As such, these conclusions support the ongoing cover-up of one of the greatest crimes in human history.
Before one can assign sponsorship of the JFK hit, one first must offer a tenable hypothesis for the murder conspiracy's structure.
The Evica-Drago model, as provided previously on this forum, does just that.
The material offered in post # 1 here must be predicated on an equally well-reasoned and openly presented model, or it must be consigned to the refuse pile of artifacts created by accessories after the fact.
Where is it?
Until we see it, these "conclusions" are worse than worthless. They are part of the cover-up.
And lest we forget, the aforementioned Mr. Jeffries is a member of another forum. So the initial post here clearly was written for another audience and as such should be considered as junk mail (my generation) or spam.
These goals are accomplished by conspirators and by their sometimes willing, sometimes deluded (sometimes both) executioners -- the ideologues.
The core values of this thread's initial content are many and varied. Its conclusions are bereft of logic, insight, and context.
As such, these conclusions support the ongoing cover-up of one of the greatest crimes in human history.
Before one can assign sponsorship of the JFK hit, one first must offer a tenable hypothesis for the murder conspiracy's structure.
The Evica-Drago model, as provided previously on this forum, does just that.
The material offered in post # 1 here must be predicated on an equally well-reasoned and openly presented model, or it must be consigned to the refuse pile of artifacts created by accessories after the fact.
Where is it?
Until we see it, these "conclusions" are worse than worthless. They are part of the cover-up.
And lest we forget, the aforementioned Mr. Jeffries is a member of another forum. So the initial post here clearly was written for another audience and as such should be considered as junk mail (my generation) or spam.