18-03-2010, 01:53 PM
I have just seen the 'offending' email and some of the following ones. As far as I can see it is all a storm in a 'c' cup. There is nothing to them. Nothing to take offense at and no sign of offense taken. Peter has been wrongly accused of a serious matter and not permitted to defend himself. His entirely understandable and justifiable reaction this false charge of cyber sexual predation and the whispering campaign against him by some was also used against him and there were questions raised about his mental health by the resident quacks and fruit loops. Methinks there is far more fertile pasture elsewhere in that lunatic asylum called the EF if looking for members with mental health issues. In addition to this slander and libel on Peter's character he has had to endure the intellectual theft and vandalism of all his posts contemptuously and vindictively being disappeared. This to me is not just an attack on Peter but on all the members. I do hope that the administrators will find enough decency somewhere with in them to at least send, electronically or otherwise, the disappeared posts to Peter so that he may have them even if they don't want them. It would also be the right thing for them to apologize to Peter for what he has had to endure from them, and to publicly retract their allegations.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.