20-03-2010, 01:46 PM
Peter, be fair and honest (even in RC-Ds post, copied previously, you were unable to post it unedited in your favour).
You were not accused during any moderators debate of being a 'sex pest' or anything remotely similar. No one knew the personalities involved or were discussing any accusations of 'sex pest' during internal moderator debates.
You will recall these specifics of the disussion were centered on you allegedly harrassing members about avatars. You are also aware there were several complaints along similar lines and not all from what would be considered the usual suspects.
We even had people posting an 'in honour of Peter Lemkin' style thread - why? This was in advance of any moderator debate. It was all a contrived nonsense...you know precisely how I felt about all your 'tedious', 'barely tangential' postings (I am trying to recall what it is you left out of RC-D's post you quote, apologies if it is not exact though I have tried to be as contextually accurate as I can) prior to any internal Peter Lemkin debate because I sent a mail saying so!
YOU brought all the sexual nature accusations and supporting information to the table, and subsequently publicly, in the private debates. Even now the worst you can do is make public 6 month old private conversations between yourself and Andy.
There was no moderator debate about you being a 'sex pest' and this was not the reason for your removal nor the reason I voted no to you remaining a moderator.
It was also YOU in a mail who asked Jack White to come to your defence publicly, copying in the EF moderating team, and including more detail than anyone knew regarding any 'sex pest' complaints. You have admitted, subsequently, this was a mistake by you and consequently Jack.
So, and lets be honest, you nailed your defence to that allegation. You took every opportunity to wilfully misrepresent what took place in the moderators debate and it was you who advertised this misrepresentation, in doing so, publicly framing yourself for a crime you, allegedly, didn't commit. A psyop even Hunt would admire.
Well done Peter. Unfounded allegations were most definitely not the reason you were removed from the EF moderating team.
Please take some responsibility for the actions you have taken. Take responsibility for nominating yourself as the only the victim in all this; and finally take responsibility for telling the real truth and not this sub-Warren Commission Report version of it.
Everything that befalls us is not the result of conspiracy. Mistakes have been made, certainly, in the deletion of your record, to which end everyone is trying to right. There is no easy solution to that problem however the will is there to right that.
You were not accused during any moderators debate of being a 'sex pest' or anything remotely similar. No one knew the personalities involved or were discussing any accusations of 'sex pest' during internal moderator debates.
You will recall these specifics of the disussion were centered on you allegedly harrassing members about avatars. You are also aware there were several complaints along similar lines and not all from what would be considered the usual suspects.
We even had people posting an 'in honour of Peter Lemkin' style thread - why? This was in advance of any moderator debate. It was all a contrived nonsense...you know precisely how I felt about all your 'tedious', 'barely tangential' postings (I am trying to recall what it is you left out of RC-D's post you quote, apologies if it is not exact though I have tried to be as contextually accurate as I can) prior to any internal Peter Lemkin debate because I sent a mail saying so!
YOU brought all the sexual nature accusations and supporting information to the table, and subsequently publicly, in the private debates. Even now the worst you can do is make public 6 month old private conversations between yourself and Andy.
There was no moderator debate about you being a 'sex pest' and this was not the reason for your removal nor the reason I voted no to you remaining a moderator.
It was also YOU in a mail who asked Jack White to come to your defence publicly, copying in the EF moderating team, and including more detail than anyone knew regarding any 'sex pest' complaints. You have admitted, subsequently, this was a mistake by you and consequently Jack.
So, and lets be honest, you nailed your defence to that allegation. You took every opportunity to wilfully misrepresent what took place in the moderators debate and it was you who advertised this misrepresentation, in doing so, publicly framing yourself for a crime you, allegedly, didn't commit. A psyop even Hunt would admire.
Well done Peter. Unfounded allegations were most definitely not the reason you were removed from the EF moderating team.
Please take some responsibility for the actions you have taken. Take responsibility for nominating yourself as the only the victim in all this; and finally take responsibility for telling the real truth and not this sub-Warren Commission Report version of it.
Everything that befalls us is not the result of conspiracy. Mistakes have been made, certainly, in the deletion of your record, to which end everyone is trying to right. There is no easy solution to that problem however the will is there to right that.