22-03-2010, 11:03 AM
Ruben Mundaca Wrote:In fact, spanish conquest (with all their limitations and diseases) bring a much better life for indigenous people in almost evry place in America. Aymaras where able to have their own land and keep most of their production (formerly, evrything belongs to the Inca). When spanish left America and specially, Bolivia, they leave behind a rich country (rich by those standards), richer than Argentina and Chile for shure, despite de destruction and poverty that bring 15 years of independence war. Now is the 2d.poorest country in American continent.
But Morales want money, and one way to gain it is to keep blaming spanish and europeans. He recive gifts, collaboration, grace remission of debts, and the sympathy and tears of ignorants.
It's very easy to exploit a history of ethnic dispossession - nationalism is so obviously good for one's people that it is adopted much more readily by people than more abstract political ideas (making all the more criminal what has been imposed on today's Europeans in an age when we all thought acknowledgement of indigenous peoples' rights was universal and going to be universally applied). But when African, South American and Asian leaders exploit manufactured 'White guilt' for good ends like debt cancellation they only get away with it because tptb are first and foremost the rulers and exploiters of Europeans and European-derived peoples. Anti-White leaders like Morales in South America, and nationalist politicians in Europe who exploit tptb's tolerance of anti-Islamic rhetoric should consider that they play a risky game. Tptb have been manipulating those kinds of politics for a long time. Carl Schmitt:
Quote:Indigenous defenders of homeland soil, who died pro aris et focis, national, patriotic heroes who went into the woods, everything which was the reaction of a telluric force in the face of foreign invasion, has now fallen to an international and supranational steering committee, which helps and supports in the interest of its own specific cosmic-aggressive ends - and which protects and abandons accordingly. The partisan ceases to be merely defensive. He becomes a manipulated tool of worldwide revolutionary aggressiveness. He thereafter becomes incensed that he had been deceived about that for which he took up his struggle, which defined his telluric character and bestowed legitimacy on his partisan irregularity.
Every Briton persuaded that Nick Griffin is right about the threat 'Islamisation' poses to Britain is a Briton primed to accept the next campaign of war propaganda against Iran, Syria or Pakistan mounted by an establishment that is just as hostile to Britain's traditional people and culture as it is to the Muslim world. And if Morales is prepared to scapegoat Europeans might he not one day face the wrath of a global elite which finds it convenient to decide that scapegoating and victimisation of Europeans is just as evil as racism against peoples who don't happen to be White?