30-03-2010, 04:54 AM
Charles, I swept right past all the other responses without reading them so as not to be influenced by them and and thus could respond to your Post #1 thesis freshly. I am not a student of the events of Dealey Plaza at the same level as almost everyone else here. I do not inherently disagree with what you have said. But what I have gleaned from a host of reading-at-a-distance and the recent excursion through JFKU is that that thesis needs the tiniest bit of tweaking.
The way I grok the process and events -- and this was leant some credence by JFKU -- is that a significant numbers of "inputs" are put into the system, threads or strings if you will, little bits of "action" and covertness that can be yanked if and when some puppeteer deems it useful. In that way, as any given plan or operation evolves, there are a number of players and plausibly deniable assets and events in play which can be "turned", twisted, yanked, or burned and destroyed. [That all of them don't get handled cleanly is simply the residue with which people like the investigators os deep politics and 'state actions against democracy' can then use to deduce what really went down. They become the clues that don't add up, or provide further insight into the actions of the perps when they themsleves are re-turned.]
I think the rustling of anti-Cuban sentiments and actions was real -- certainly for lots of the people involved. That it was never intended to "go live" then must be seen as true or not true only in the light of things that never occurred or tumbled into place.
But then I was never a high-level spook...
The way I grok the process and events -- and this was leant some credence by JFKU -- is that a significant numbers of "inputs" are put into the system, threads or strings if you will, little bits of "action" and covertness that can be yanked if and when some puppeteer deems it useful. In that way, as any given plan or operation evolves, there are a number of players and plausibly deniable assets and events in play which can be "turned", twisted, yanked, or burned and destroyed. [That all of them don't get handled cleanly is simply the residue with which people like the investigators os deep politics and 'state actions against democracy' can then use to deduce what really went down. They become the clues that don't add up, or provide further insight into the actions of the perps when they themsleves are re-turned.]
I think the rustling of anti-Cuban sentiments and actions was real -- certainly for lots of the people involved. That it was never intended to "go live" then must be seen as true or not true only in the light of things that never occurred or tumbled into place.
But then I was never a high-level spook...
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"