29-04-2010, 04:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 29-04-2010, 04:34 PM by John Kowalski.)
Paul Rigby Wrote:[quote=John Kowalski]Paul - fundamentally you seem to believe that differences of interpretation are the result of malign influences.
Fundamentally, John, er, no. But I do so admire ad homs, they're so much more interesting than stuff like evidence. Which, I have to say, you're very wise to avoid.
The perfect - only - fitting epitaph for his career, Dawn, a career of deception and deceit in the service of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Paul:
What is your evidence that he is a CIA asset? You know this for sure? When you reply, provide evidence. The fact that he disagrees with JFK or 9/11 conspiracy theories is not evidence that he is working for the CIA. Provide concrete evidence: a document, testimony, anything that proves that he is trying to influence conspiracy opinion on behalf of the CIA, the government or any other organization.
John