Badgeman

[Dawn Meredith]

you got to watch out for duncan.

I suggest you take up duncans challenge and ask him to produce that negative.

The House Committee on assassinations could not find it. But duncan can find it.

I say make a public demand on duncan to produce that negative.


If a member of his forum has the negative then lets do it. Many researches would like to have access to that negative.

I say call duncans bluff. (because that is all it is).

We can answer this question once and for all.

Duncans desire to harass me out weighs his good judgment sometimes.

Enough is enough. Please stop insulting people and making DEMANDS. THis is a serious forum. We don't permit spamming and the like. I have been too busy with my job the last few days to spend time here but just reading through this thread it is becoming clear that you have an agenda and it is not truth. "Duncan's bluff?" "Jack's refusal" to respond to "hard questions"? Please. You are sounding like just another Jack attacker and we are all very tired of that crap. He has given his life to this case and still answers questions every day. Duncan too, has been doing this for many years. His work is very respected. You are bordering on harrassment.
The HSCA could not find a lot of things because they choose not to. And if you were a true serious researcher you would know this very basic truth. I am reading that you have been banned from other forums. Mind telling us which forums and why?

Dawn

I have only read up to this post above so perhaps I should have waited until I reached the rest of this thread but I am willing to bet it is just more of the same.