Oswald autopsy photographic fakery?

[Allan Eaglesham]

You have omitted the space between the legs, which was greater on the
black-and-white than in the color version. Plus, as I previously observed,
the testicles in the black-and-white appear to be larger and heavier. The
penis itself does not look the same in both either. I am not convinced.

There's no fakery, Jim.

The space between the legs is irelevant to the size of Oswald's member.
You are mistaking shadow ( more of which can be seen in the black and white photograph because of the different camera angle ) for a wider space in the black and white photograph, than in the color photograph.
The colour photograph is taken from an almost directly above the body position, whereas the black and white photograph has been taken from the left side of Oswald's body, and probably at a distance behind his feet, hence the difference.
Remember that things, anything, look smaller when looking down.

Duncan:

I agree. I made this comparison a few days ago.

The apparent difference is something of an optical illusion, due to difference in camera angle.

Allan