15-05-2010, 09:20 PM
Anthony Marsh Wrote:Jack White Wrote:Anthony Marsh Wrote:Jack White Wrote:Jim...Dr. Rose's autopsy reports the pubic hair shaved.
The photos show the same.
That Judyth Baker disputes this does not necessarily show
photographic fakery. There are many options to explain
this oddity, including that Judyth did not know...especially
since she is quoted as having said conflicting things about his
"private parts."
Jack
The Dallas police shaved Oswald's public hair for evidence.
I find that not credible. (provide evidence)
These photos were taken at Parkland with LHO freshly deceased.
I believe Dr. Rose dated the autopsy at 2:45 p.m.
If your statement is valid, the DPD "shaving of pubic hairs" took
precedence over the autopsy. Why were they so in need of the hairs?
Before the autopsy? Why shave the whole area, instead of just a sample?
The DPD "theory" makes no sense.
Jack
You didn't seem to understand what I said. I said that the DPD shaved Oswald's pubic hair for evidence while
he was in their custody, while he was alive.
They wanted to compare it to a hair they had found
on the blanket.
So they shaved THE ENTIRE PUBIC AREA TO GET ONE SAMPLE?
Can you document this?
Jack