15-05-2010, 09:44 PM
Anthony Marsh Wrote:Jack White Wrote:Anthony Marsh Wrote:Jack White Wrote:I find that not credible. (provide evidence)
These photos were taken at Parkland with LHO freshly deceased.
I believe Dr. Rose dated the autopsy at 2:45 p.m.
If your statement is valid, the DPD "shaving of pubic hairs" took
precedence over the autopsy. Why were they so in need of the hairs?
Before the autopsy? Why shave the whole area, instead of just a sample?
The DPD "theory" makes no sense.
Jack
You didn't seem to understand what I said. I said that the DPD shaved Oswald's pubic hair for evidence while
he was in their custody, while he was alive.
They wanted to compare it to a hair they had found
on the blanket.
So they shaved THE ENTIRE PUBIC AREA TO GET ONE SAMPLE?
Can you document this?
Jack
Maybe if I could figure out how to upload documents with this klunky forum software.
So, since you are such a genius maybe you could explain how they could have shaved ANY sample at all from his pubic area if he was already and always cleanly shaved as we see in the autopsy photo?
http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/35/3597-002.gif

