26-12-2008, 11:54 AM
(This post was last modified: 26-12-2008, 05:04 PM by Charles Drago.)
Bill,
Your presence on the DPF is welcome indeed.
In terms of his product's impact on his masters' agenda, Russo amounts to a double-edged sword (giving a fresh meaning to Operation Gladio). In essence, he brings new and valuable material to the discussion, and then draws from it conclusions that are patently absurd.
His game, of course, is to dazzle with the former, and then utilize the authority its "discovery" lends to sell the latest iteration of the coverup.
Lamar Waldron is about the same business, although I'm willing to concede that, as opposed to Russo, he is more likely the duped than the duper (which is why Waldron is welcome on the DPF and Russo isn't, if I may attempt to clarify once again the issue you and I have discussed most recently).
Back to the gladio analogy: In order for Russo to sell his disinformation-as-conclusions to the broadest possible customer base, he must incorporate into his offering nuggets of highly significant, previously suppressed truth. In theory, only a tiny percentage of his readers will possess the requisite skills to seperate the aurum from the iron pyrite -- and virtually none of them will be in a position to finance anything even remotely threatening with this treasure.
But there's no such thing as a sure thing.
And so we march forward.
Good to have you here, BK.
Your presence on the DPF is welcome indeed.
In terms of his product's impact on his masters' agenda, Russo amounts to a double-edged sword (giving a fresh meaning to Operation Gladio). In essence, he brings new and valuable material to the discussion, and then draws from it conclusions that are patently absurd.
His game, of course, is to dazzle with the former, and then utilize the authority its "discovery" lends to sell the latest iteration of the coverup.
Lamar Waldron is about the same business, although I'm willing to concede that, as opposed to Russo, he is more likely the duped than the duper (which is why Waldron is welcome on the DPF and Russo isn't, if I may attempt to clarify once again the issue you and I have discussed most recently).
Back to the gladio analogy: In order for Russo to sell his disinformation-as-conclusions to the broadest possible customer base, he must incorporate into his offering nuggets of highly significant, previously suppressed truth. In theory, only a tiny percentage of his readers will possess the requisite skills to seperate the aurum from the iron pyrite -- and virtually none of them will be in a position to finance anything even remotely threatening with this treasure.
But there's no such thing as a sure thing.
And so we march forward.
Good to have you here, BK.
