10-08-2010, 02:32 AM
I apologize to all for my transgression.
I still have a problem with the identification of actual chemtrails.
To make a positive ID on something you must already know what it should look like.
Example:
To identify an auto from 3-4 miles away we must look for the identifying characteristics of an auto. Like 2 round objects equal distant from opposite ends and a bulbous area slightly off set from the center line. We all would recognize it as an automobile since we see them every day.
But recognizing a chemtrail? Who has actually seen an actual chemtrail? This would have to be someone on the inside. This person would have had to watch the loading of some chemical onto a plane and then seen the spraying. A whistle blower. Where are these people with their pictures? Every news paper in the country would love to get a scoop of this magnitude. Remember Woodward and Bernstein? It defined their careers. If you want to secure your news job for life in these times of layoffs and company failures, get your name on the 'by line' of the century.
How do we know it's chemicals being sprayed? Just because some web blogger says so?
I'll do you one better. I know what it is. It's baby milk! Yes milk. Here's my proof.
These trails last longer and disperse slower that contrails right.
What's better than something that starts white and stays white? Even though it spreads out, the particulate matter stays white and creates a hazy milky sky.
Why milk you ask? Easy. The government has been supporting the dairy industry for decades. Now with the modern dairy farming methods we have far too much milk. The government fears a collapse in the price structure of dairy products. The best way to stave off a collapse is to remove product (milk).
But how to get rid of the milk? You can't just dump it down the drain because it will sour the mash (so to speak) of the public waste treatment plants. You can't dump it into the ocean as the beach combers and day sailors will see the white patches of water. There's no better way to dispose of it than dumping it out of a an airplane. It's hard to get caught with your pants down in this scenario. Who's going to question a series of milk trucks driving down the road. We see them almost every day. And if you get suspicious and pull one over, what a surprise, It's got milk! No cop is going to investigate any farther than that. Airports need milk too don't they?
Not to pick on Jack but in post #21 you state:
If it will let me post a picture, your picture matches a picture I found from 1940. The sawtooth pattern is nothing new.
![[Image: 1944-91st-bomber-contrails.jpg]](http://consci.s3.amazonaws.com//images/1944-91st-bomber-contrails.jpg)
From my analysis and this picture we must have been spraying the Nazis' with baby milk!
I still have a problem with the identification of actual chemtrails.
To make a positive ID on something you must already know what it should look like.
Example:
To identify an auto from 3-4 miles away we must look for the identifying characteristics of an auto. Like 2 round objects equal distant from opposite ends and a bulbous area slightly off set from the center line. We all would recognize it as an automobile since we see them every day.
But recognizing a chemtrail? Who has actually seen an actual chemtrail? This would have to be someone on the inside. This person would have had to watch the loading of some chemical onto a plane and then seen the spraying. A whistle blower. Where are these people with their pictures? Every news paper in the country would love to get a scoop of this magnitude. Remember Woodward and Bernstein? It defined their careers. If you want to secure your news job for life in these times of layoffs and company failures, get your name on the 'by line' of the century.
How do we know it's chemicals being sprayed? Just because some web blogger says so?
I'll do you one better. I know what it is. It's baby milk! Yes milk. Here's my proof.
These trails last longer and disperse slower that contrails right.
What's better than something that starts white and stays white? Even though it spreads out, the particulate matter stays white and creates a hazy milky sky.
Why milk you ask? Easy. The government has been supporting the dairy industry for decades. Now with the modern dairy farming methods we have far too much milk. The government fears a collapse in the price structure of dairy products. The best way to stave off a collapse is to remove product (milk).
But how to get rid of the milk? You can't just dump it down the drain because it will sour the mash (so to speak) of the public waste treatment plants. You can't dump it into the ocean as the beach combers and day sailors will see the white patches of water. There's no better way to dispose of it than dumping it out of a an airplane. It's hard to get caught with your pants down in this scenario. Who's going to question a series of milk trucks driving down the road. We see them almost every day. And if you get suspicious and pull one over, what a surprise, It's got milk! No cop is going to investigate any farther than that. Airports need milk too don't they?
Not to pick on Jack but in post #21 you state:
Quote:The "sawtooth" feature seems to be a new feature to cause the chemtrails to have
a more natural cirrus-like appearance when they disperse.
If it will let me post a picture, your picture matches a picture I found from 1940. The sawtooth pattern is nothing new.
From my analysis and this picture we must have been spraying the Nazis' with baby milk!