|
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7
|
02-01-2009, 08:10 PM
David Guyatt Wrote:Roll on Part II. Foundation structures were simultaneously removed by an external force or mechanism - with explosive implications, not least for NIST's credibility. Part 2: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XtKLtUiww80 Part 3: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Vz43hcKYBm4 NIST: “pseudo-science in the service of an on-going cover-up,” David Chandler. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Paul Rigby - 31-12-2008, 04:56 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by David Guyatt - 02-01-2009, 10:39 AM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Peter Lemkin - 02-01-2009, 10:49 AM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Dawn Meredith - 02-01-2009, 03:49 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Myra Bronstein - 02-01-2009, 06:14 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Paul Rigby - 02-01-2009, 08:10 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Myra Bronstein - 02-01-2009, 08:38 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Paul Rigby - 02-01-2009, 10:07 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by David Guyatt - 03-01-2009, 12:00 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Dawn Meredith - 03-01-2009, 04:55 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Myra Bronstein - 03-01-2009, 06:24 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Paul Rigby - 03-01-2009, 07:31 PM
|
