|
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7
|
03-01-2009, 04:55 PM
David Guyatt Wrote:All 3 parts really are very convincing visual evidence of complete bollocks in action... NIST doesn't have a leg to stand on. Agreed. It does not get any more in your face than this. Tower 7 was their equivilant of LHO with his old Italian gun with the faulty scope. Dawn |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Paul Rigby - 31-12-2008, 04:56 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by David Guyatt - 02-01-2009, 10:39 AM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Peter Lemkin - 02-01-2009, 10:49 AM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Dawn Meredith - 02-01-2009, 03:49 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Myra Bronstein - 02-01-2009, 06:14 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Paul Rigby - 02-01-2009, 08:10 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Myra Bronstein - 02-01-2009, 08:38 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Paul Rigby - 02-01-2009, 10:07 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by David Guyatt - 03-01-2009, 12:00 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Dawn Meredith - 03-01-2009, 04:55 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Myra Bronstein - 03-01-2009, 06:24 PM
NIST credibility in free-fall on WTC7 - by Paul Rigby - 03-01-2009, 07:31 PM
|
