26-09-2010, 11:38 PM
"... At the time of 9-11, I was renting a duplex on the upper west side Manhattan, and I had 2 roommates: one Pakistani, and one Indian; both were British citizens. I knew them because the Pakistani gentleman was a client of SilverStream; and was the Head of Emerging Technology for Deutsche Bank. He led me into a company called Panacya (PANACYA), where I started work in November 2001 as the Director of Sales for Financial Services. At the time, Deutsche Bank was in the midst of a project called “Blue Sky”, which had a budget of approximately $200 million dollars, and Panacya was one of the technologies in contention for part of the contract.
The Panacya product- called “b@ware”- was the confluence between artificial intelligence and systems monitoring software, whereby it could be applied to observe a given environment and actually learn in a variety of ways- either through learned behavior based on observation and interaction, or encapsulated instructions conditioned by an authoritative source. This learning and real-time observation was then compared against both real-time and historical information; the function of performance of course being dependent on the validity of the history which the software references to make its decisions.
Based on these premises, the software could be applied to a system wherein it begins to learn; and parallel agents remotely observe the environment, share information in a peer to peer manner, and acclimate- both as a group and individually- to become a virtually decentralized network, which produces quality intelligence.
When the software agent matures, it is said to graduate, and in that state it can actively & accurately predict critical events BEFORE THEY OCCUR; and has the ability to take preemptive action, either learned or conditioned behaviors, to prevent critical events from affecting clients or transactions. Of course, if the agent is cut off from its authoritative components, it can only collect and store information, until it reconnects with the authoritative engine whereby action can be taken.
Allow me restate that: The software gives the user the ability to predict critical events in the applied environment: BEFORE THEY OCCUR, for the purpose of taking pre-emptive action. In simplest terms, the Panacya product could be applied to any information technology architecture, monitor every aspect of that architecture, actively learn, and then consistently predict pending crashes- so that they could be fixed before they occurred and costly downtime was encountered.
Here’s the practical use: Let’s say a client of mine, Fidelity, processes $500,000,000 worth of transactions on a particular server per hour. What is the cost of that server being down for an hour, or a day? How much is it worth to a Corporation to be able to prevent losing $500,000,000 worth of transactions? ...and that’s just the savings realized from preventing one hour of downtime.
I would also ask the question: If software this powerful is being openly offered commercially, are we to believe that our intelligence community doesn’t have software at least this powerful? –and under that supposition- that they indeed do- is it not fair to assume that the intelligence community was at the very least aware of some sort of impending critical event prior to 9-11? After all, in hindsight, the Administration itself has offered forth numerous memos and warnings that were received prior to 9-11…
In fact, in many instances, these memos and/or warnings were used as a basis of action by the current Administration… but unfortunately for the American People, the actions taken were not to warn the People of impending danger, but rather to capitalize on the tragedy- as the fraudulent transactions can be tracked back to intelligence community executives responsible for the protection of our own country.
I would also mention at this point, that the information technology systems used by our intelligence community became a virtual scapegoat post-9-11… under the guise of “intelligence failures”, wherein they claimed that 9-11 was a result of the intelligence agencies allegedly not being able to effectively share information across organizations.
In fact, the information systems and software tasked with preserving the security of our country, performed without fail, as all of the “failures” were choreographed and contrived so as to present the illusion which served as the propulsion mechanism through which the intelligence community could be brought under the control of one man- by creating a position called Director of National Intelligence- a position currently occupied by John Negroponte… just look him up in Wikipedia if you’re not making the connection between the position of DNI and the 9-11 Commission recommendations.
Lastly on this topic I would mention that the FBI recently had a $250 million software project to integrate their systems, and interestingly, like many projects of its kind, it was suspiciously cancelled- but only after receiving approval and funding. Where does all the money go?"
From the transcript provided to me by Richard Andrew Grove based on his appearance on the Maria Heller show... Track 8
http://www.commongroundcommonsense.org/f...7&&st=390#
The Panacya product- called “b@ware”- was the confluence between artificial intelligence and systems monitoring software, whereby it could be applied to observe a given environment and actually learn in a variety of ways- either through learned behavior based on observation and interaction, or encapsulated instructions conditioned by an authoritative source. This learning and real-time observation was then compared against both real-time and historical information; the function of performance of course being dependent on the validity of the history which the software references to make its decisions.
Based on these premises, the software could be applied to a system wherein it begins to learn; and parallel agents remotely observe the environment, share information in a peer to peer manner, and acclimate- both as a group and individually- to become a virtually decentralized network, which produces quality intelligence.
When the software agent matures, it is said to graduate, and in that state it can actively & accurately predict critical events BEFORE THEY OCCUR; and has the ability to take preemptive action, either learned or conditioned behaviors, to prevent critical events from affecting clients or transactions. Of course, if the agent is cut off from its authoritative components, it can only collect and store information, until it reconnects with the authoritative engine whereby action can be taken.
Allow me restate that: The software gives the user the ability to predict critical events in the applied environment: BEFORE THEY OCCUR, for the purpose of taking pre-emptive action. In simplest terms, the Panacya product could be applied to any information technology architecture, monitor every aspect of that architecture, actively learn, and then consistently predict pending crashes- so that they could be fixed before they occurred and costly downtime was encountered.
Here’s the practical use: Let’s say a client of mine, Fidelity, processes $500,000,000 worth of transactions on a particular server per hour. What is the cost of that server being down for an hour, or a day? How much is it worth to a Corporation to be able to prevent losing $500,000,000 worth of transactions? ...and that’s just the savings realized from preventing one hour of downtime.
I would also ask the question: If software this powerful is being openly offered commercially, are we to believe that our intelligence community doesn’t have software at least this powerful? –and under that supposition- that they indeed do- is it not fair to assume that the intelligence community was at the very least aware of some sort of impending critical event prior to 9-11? After all, in hindsight, the Administration itself has offered forth numerous memos and warnings that were received prior to 9-11…
In fact, in many instances, these memos and/or warnings were used as a basis of action by the current Administration… but unfortunately for the American People, the actions taken were not to warn the People of impending danger, but rather to capitalize on the tragedy- as the fraudulent transactions can be tracked back to intelligence community executives responsible for the protection of our own country.
I would also mention at this point, that the information technology systems used by our intelligence community became a virtual scapegoat post-9-11… under the guise of “intelligence failures”, wherein they claimed that 9-11 was a result of the intelligence agencies allegedly not being able to effectively share information across organizations.
In fact, the information systems and software tasked with preserving the security of our country, performed without fail, as all of the “failures” were choreographed and contrived so as to present the illusion which served as the propulsion mechanism through which the intelligence community could be brought under the control of one man- by creating a position called Director of National Intelligence- a position currently occupied by John Negroponte… just look him up in Wikipedia if you’re not making the connection between the position of DNI and the 9-11 Commission recommendations.
Lastly on this topic I would mention that the FBI recently had a $250 million software project to integrate their systems, and interestingly, like many projects of its kind, it was suspiciously cancelled- but only after receiving approval and funding. Where does all the money go?"
From the transcript provided to me by Richard Andrew Grove based on his appearance on the Maria Heller show... Track 8
http://www.commongroundcommonsense.org/f...7&&st=390#
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"