06-01-2009, 07:18 PM
The problem with apportioning blame is where do you stop? In truth those responsible were a cast of thousands -- tens of thousands. They all closed their eyes to the coup d'etat because they all wanted it and all benefited from it.
If you know the "why" then everything else falls into place.
But know that Allen Dulles was one of the key players in the War & Peace Study Group - and, of course, the CIA and the Waren Commission. Know that the Rockefeller Foundation financed the study. Know also that Allen Dulles served Rockefeller as his lawyer. As he did Prescott Bush and Harriman.
While the names of some (or all?) of the shooters are known, the only real identity you can place on those responsible for JFK's assassination is the "ruling elite" of the day. WE could also call it "business" or "corporate America", but mostly let's agree to call it "human greed" -- for that is what ultimately drove the underlying agenda.
Today the Dulles brothers are long gone, Harriman is gone - his wife Pamela continued using her considerable influence well into the Clinton presidency, and the Bush and Rockefeller clans still pull some (but certainly not all) of the strings...
1 see: http://www.enter.net/~torve/trogholm/sec...dulles.htm
If you know the "why" then everything else falls into place.
But know that Allen Dulles was one of the key players in the War & Peace Study Group - and, of course, the CIA and the Waren Commission. Know that the Rockefeller Foundation financed the study. Know also that Allen Dulles served Rockefeller as his lawyer. As he did Prescott Bush and Harriman.
While the names of some (or all?) of the shooters are known, the only real identity you can place on those responsible for JFK's assassination is the "ruling elite" of the day. WE could also call it "business" or "corporate America", but mostly let's agree to call it "human greed" -- for that is what ultimately drove the underlying agenda.
Today the Dulles brothers are long gone, Harriman is gone - his wife Pamela continued using her considerable influence well into the Clinton presidency, and the Bush and Rockefeller clans still pull some (but certainly not all) of the strings...
1 see: http://www.enter.net/~torve/trogholm/sec...dulles.htm
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14