03-01-2011, 02:46 AM
For what reason was it "reported"? That was about as mild a post as this thread
has seen. He said he was deferring to Jefferson Morley. Since my reinvestigation
has shown that Morley--and Talbot and DiEugenio--were wrong, how can it possibly
be right to encourage him to follow an authority whose conclusions were mistaken?
has seen. He said he was deferring to Jefferson Morley. Since my reinvestigation
has shown that Morley--and Talbot and DiEugenio--were wrong, how can it possibly
be right to encourage him to follow an authority whose conclusions were mistaken?
Dawn Meredith Wrote:Jim: This post has been reported. Please do not insult our members.
I for one did not think this post reflected a "lack of qualifications".
If you treated your students in this fashion I think you'd soon have no students.
We can disagree on the evidence with out resorting to breaking the rules here.
Thank you for your anticipated understanding,
Dawn