03-01-2011, 10:15 PM
James H. Fetzer Wrote:For him to argue at this stage of the debate that there is no evidence that LBJ was handling Oswald in New Orleans has to establish a new level of absurdity, even for Jimmy D.
I am convinced.
It is so because James Fetzer says it is so.
Johnson was all over New Orleans in the months leading up to the assassination. He had beignets with Bannister, sex with Shaw, ratatouille with Russo, fried fish with Ferrie, bratwurst with Bringuierr, and all the while hand-held the patsy-to-be through every stage of the sheep-dipping which he had planned, between psychotic episodes, over the previous four years.
LBJ, the Big Sleazy, ran the show in the Big Easy! And don't give me any "There isn't a shard of evidence to support such a ludicrous claim!" bullshit.
It is so because James Fetzer says it is so.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene