03-01-2011, 11:00 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-01-2011, 11:36 PM by James H. Fetzer.)
Nice to see that Phil has finally gotten a hold of a copy of the book. DiEugenio
continues to astonish and bewilder! I HAVE NEVER SUGGESTED THAT LBJ
WAS CONTROLLING OSWALD ANYWHERE. He did reach out to DA Wade
and to Will Fritz to control the investigation. But he also played a key role
in setting it up, including sending Cliff Carter, his chief administrative aide,
to Dallas to make sure all of the arrangements were in place for the murder.
With the CIA and the Joint Chiefs on his side, he didn't have to "do it all"!
This has to be another example where Jim is so careless and incapable of
serious thought that he attacks me with baseless drivel. I can't believe--will,
I guess NOW I can!--that after I have exposed his shoddy tactics by relying
upon exaggerated versions of my position THAT HE WOULD DO IT AGAIN.
Your learning curve must have a downward slope, Jim. And that Charles, who
has finally begun to read the book--where this post provides conclusive proof
he hadn't read it before!--tells me that he is going to have to reread the thread.
For Charles to be recycling ridiculous canards about DISINFORMATION and
all that when they have already been blown out of the water is stunning and
tells me that, alas, Jim is not the only one here who is capable of shoddy
reasoning. DRAGO EVEN SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN TAKEN IN BY JIM'S TRIPE
AS TO WHAT DEGREE OF CONTROL LBJ HAD TO HAVE IN THIS CASE. He,
too, is operation on assumptions proven false. If Charles is not completely
blowing his capital on this exchange, then I can't imagine what it would take.
continues to astonish and bewilder! I HAVE NEVER SUGGESTED THAT LBJ
WAS CONTROLLING OSWALD ANYWHERE. He did reach out to DA Wade
and to Will Fritz to control the investigation. But he also played a key role
in setting it up, including sending Cliff Carter, his chief administrative aide,
to Dallas to make sure all of the arrangements were in place for the murder.
With the CIA and the Joint Chiefs on his side, he didn't have to "do it all"!
This has to be another example where Jim is so careless and incapable of
serious thought that he attacks me with baseless drivel. I can't believe--will,
I guess NOW I can!--that after I have exposed his shoddy tactics by relying
upon exaggerated versions of my position THAT HE WOULD DO IT AGAIN.
Your learning curve must have a downward slope, Jim. And that Charles, who
has finally begun to read the book--where this post provides conclusive proof
he hadn't read it before!--tells me that he is going to have to reread the thread.
For Charles to be recycling ridiculous canards about DISINFORMATION and
all that when they have already been blown out of the water is stunning and
tells me that, alas, Jim is not the only one here who is capable of shoddy
reasoning. DRAGO EVEN SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN TAKEN IN BY JIM'S TRIPE
AS TO WHAT DEGREE OF CONTROL LBJ HAD TO HAVE IN THIS CASE. He,
too, is operation on assumptions proven false. If Charles is not completely
blowing his capital on this exchange, then I can't imagine what it would take.
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Ok, now Fetzer seems to be backtracking even further.
For now he has dropped any pretense of LBJ handling Oswald in New Orleans, and in fact Mexico City.
So that narrows down the mastermind rubric quite a bit.
So if LBJ was not in on the setting up of Oswald, then what are you now saying?
That he only controlled things in Dallas?
Ok, then what did he control and how did he control it?
Did LBJ arrange the shooting of Officer Tippit? How?
Did Mac Wallace kill Kennedy? THen who were the other assassins?
Did LBJ send Ruby to kill Oswald? What is the evidence for this?